logo czasopisma

Articles

Vol. 58 No. 5 (2025): Prawo i Więź nr 5 (58) 2025

Weaponizing Memory: The Legal Implications of Russia’s Monument Policy on Occupied Territories of Ukraine

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36128/51wrfe35
Submitted
6 August 2025
Published
18-11-2025

Abstract

This article explores Russia’s use of monuments as tools of ideological control in occupied Ukrainian territories following the 2022 invasion.  Focusing on the removal, alteration, or erection of monuments and the reconfiguration of symbolic space, the study situates these actions within the frameworks of international humanitarian law and international human rights law. The article argues that by dismantling Ukrainian memorials and restoring Soviet symbols, Russia seeks to rewrite historical memory and impose its narrative, thus violating the conservationist principle of occupation and undermining cultural rights. Drawing on the concepts of memoricide and identicide, it calls for stronger legal safeguards to protect national memory and cultural identity under occupation in contemporary armed conflicts.

References

  1. Basu, Paul. “Memoryscapes and Multi-Sited Methods.” [in:] Research Methods for Memory Studies, ed. Emily Knightley and Michael Pickering, 115-31 . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Bazhenova, Hanna. “Genocidal Dimensions of the Russo Ukrainian War: Targeting the People and Cultural Heritage of Ukraine.” Genocidas ir rezistencija 2, No. 56 (2024): 218-236.
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Benvenisti, Eyal. The International Law of Occupation. Rev. ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Blake, Janet. “On Defining the Cultural Heritage.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 49, No. 1 (2000): 61-85.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Boyer, Pascal. “Extending the Range of Adaptive Misbelief: Memory ‘Distortions’ as Functional Features.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32, No. 6 (2009): 513-514. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09991397.
    View in Google Scholar
  6. British Institute of International and Comparative Law (BIICL). “How Does International Law Protect Ukrainian Cultural Heritage in War? Is It Protected Differently Than Other Civilian Objects?” London: BIICL, March 10, 2022. https://www.biicl.org/documents/11200_how_does_international_law_protect_ukrainian_cultural_heritage_in_war.pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Boutruche, Théo, and Marco Sassòli. Expert Opinion on the Occupier’s Legislative Power over an Occupied Territory under IHL in Light of Israel’s On going Occupation. Norwegian Refugee Council, June 2017. https://www.nrc.no/globalassets/pdf/legal-opinions/sassoli.pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Bromwich, Jonah Engel. “What Does It Mean to Tear Down a Statue?” The New York Times, June 11, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/11/style/confederate-statue-columbus-analysis.html.
    View in Google Scholar
  9. #Bukvy. “Ukrainian Military Memorial Destroyed by Occupiers in Mariupol.” August 3, 2022. https://mezha.net/eng/bukvy/ukrainian-military-memorial-destroyed-by-occupiers-in-mariupol/.
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Callahan, Molly. “The Other Casualty of the War in Ukraine – Architecture.” News @ Northeastern, March 25, 2022. https://news.northeastern.edu/2022/03/25/ukraine-architecture-destruction/.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Campanelli, Danio. “The Law of Military Occupation Put to the Test of Human Rights Law.” International Review of the Red Cross 90, No. 871 (2008): 653-683.
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Charlier, Benjamin, and Tural Mustafayev. “International Humanitarian Law and the Protection of Cultural Property.” [in:] Cultural Heritage and Mass Atrocities, eds. Cuno, James, and Thomas G. Weiss. Getty Publications, 2022. https://www.getty.edu/publications/cultural-heritage-mass-atrocities/part-4/22-charlier-mustafayev.
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Civallero, Edgardo. “When Memory Is Turned into Ashes… Memoricide during the XX Century.” Information for Social Change, Summer 2007: 7-22. National University of Córdoba. https://www.aacademica.org/edgardo.civallero/113.pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Clack, Timothy. “Cultural Heritage on the Frontline: The Destruction of Peoples and Identities in War.” University of Oxford, October 4, 2022. https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2022-10-04-cultural-heritage-frontline-destruction-peoples-and-identities-war.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, Jean Louise. “The Role of International Law in Post-Conflict Constitution-Making: Toward a Jus Post Bellum for Interim Occupations.” New York Law School Law Review 51, No. 3 (2006): 497-532. Cited in Bamigboye, E. P., and V. O. Ayeni. “Laying the Foundations for Jus Post Bellum: The Conservationist Principle in the Law of Occupation as a Foundation for a Fourth Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions.” International Journal of Comparative Law and Legal Philosophy 4, no. 1 (2022): 61–67.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, with Regulations for its Execution, adopted at The Hague, May 14, 1954, entered into force August 7, 1956.
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Council of Europe. Factsheet on Memory Laws. July 2018. https://rm.coe.int/factsheet-on-memory-laws-july2018-docx/16808c1690.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Coynash, Halya. “Russia Destroys Monuments to Victims of Holodomor and Stalin’s Terror in Occupied Luhansk.” Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group, July 22, 2024. https://khpg.org/en/1608813845.
    View in Google Scholar
  19. “Cultural Destruction in Ukraine by Russian Forces Will Reverberate for Years, UN Rights Expert Warns.” UN News, May 25, 2022. https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/05/1119052.
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Dinstein, Yoram. Legislation under Article 43 of the Hague Regulations: Belligerent Occupation and Peacebuilding. Occasional Paper No. 1. Harvard Program on Humanitarian Policy and Conflict Research, Fall 2004.
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Ferraro, Tristan. “Occupation and Other Forms of Administration of Foreign Territory.” [in:] Expert Meeting Report, 117. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, March 2012.
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Fiankan-Bokonga, Catherine. “UNESCO: Deliberate Destruction of Ukraine’s Cultural Heritage Could Be Considered a War Crime.” Geneva Solutions, May 16, 2022. https://genevasolutions.news/peace-humanitarian/unesco-deliberate-destruction-of-ukraine-s-cultural-heritage-could-be-considered-a-war-crime.
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Gabowitsch, Mischa, and Mykola Homanyuk. Monuments and Territory: War Memorials in Russian Occupied Ukraine. Budapest/New York: CEU Press, 2025.
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Giacca, Gilles. Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights in Armed Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Hall, Sophia Alexandra. “Russian Occupiers Destroy Memorial of Ukrainian Opera Singer Who Died Defending His Country.” Classic FM, July 13, 2022. https://www.classicfm.com/music-news/ukraine-opera-singer-memorial-destroyed/.
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Hirsch, Francine. “Putin’s Memory Laws Set the Stage for His War in Ukraine.” Lawfare, 28 February 2022. https://www.lawfareblog.com/putins-memory-laws-set-stage-his-war-ukraine.
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Hoeniger, Cathleen. “The Protection of Monuments and Immoveable Works of Art from War Damage: A Comparison of Italy in World War II and Ukraine during the Russian Invasion.” Arts 13, No. 2 (2024): 65-89 . https://doi.org/10.3390/arts13020065.
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Hookway, Demelza. “Soviet Monuments Are Being Toppled – This Gives the Spaces They Occupied a New Meaning.” Connecting Research, September 26, 2022. https://research.reading.ac.uk/research-blog/soviet-monuments-are-being-toppled-this-gives-the-spaces-they-occupied-a-new-meaning/.
    View in Google Scholar
  29. International Committee of the Red Cross. Customary IHL: Rule 40 – Respect for Cultural Property, part of the Customary IHL Database. Accessed July 1, 2025. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/customary-ihl/v1/rule40#Fn_7420CB30_00003.
    View in Google Scholar
  30. International Committee of the Red Cross. The Law of Armed Conflict: Belligerent Occupation, Lesson 9. Geneva: ICRC, June 2002. https://www.icrc.org/sites/default/files/external/doc/en/assets/files/other/law9_final.pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Kherson-news.ru. “Бывших АТОшников привлекают к общественной работе.” May 5, 2022. https://kherson-news.ru/incident/2022/05/05/990.html.
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Kherson-news.ru. “В Геническе восстановлен памятник воинам Великой Отечественной войны.” October 31, 2022. https://kherson-news.ru/society/2022/10/31/59888.html.
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Kirchmair, Lando. “The War of Aggression Against Ukraine, Cultural Property and Genocide: Why It Is Imperative to Take a Close Look at Cultural Property.” EJIL Talk!, March 21, 2022. https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-war-of-aggression-against-ukraine-cultural-property-and-genocide-why-it-is-imperative-to-take-a-close-look-at-cultural-property/.
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Kirillov, Vladimir. “How and Why Russia Is Rebuilding Lenin’s Monuments in Occupied Ukrainian Territories.” Belsat, February 12, 2025. https://en.belsat.eu/84418402/how-and-why-russia-is-rebuilding-lenins-monuments-in-occupied-ukrainian-territories.
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Koposov, Nikolay. Memory Laws, Memory Wars: The Politics of the Past in Europe and Russia. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Koval, Nadiia, and Oleksandra Gaidai. “The Destruction of Ukrainian Cultural Heritage during Full - Scale Invasion in 2022.” CERI – Sciences Po, April 2022. https://www.sciencespo.fr/ceri/fr/content/dossiersduceri/destruction-ukrainian-cultural-heritage-during-russia-s-full-scale-invasion-2022.
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Kulturowe Studia Krajobrazowe. “Memory of Landscape Archives.” Accessed October 22, 2025. http://studiakrajobrazowe.amu.edu.pl/en/vocabulary_tag/memory-of-landscape/.
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Lanciotti, Alessandra. „Preservation of Historical Buildings through the Lens of International Law.” Real Estate 1, No. 2 (2024): 198-211. https://doi.org/10.3390/realestate1020010.
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Lartey, Solomon. “The Role of Monuments in Commemorating History and Controversies Surrounding Their Preservation.” ResearchGate (preprint), September 2, 2024.
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Leathem, Hilary Morgan V. “Monumental Destruction.” Monument Lab, September 14, 2020. https://monumentlab.com/bulletin/monumental-destruction.
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Advisory Opinion. I.C.J. Reports 2004, 136.
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Lister, Tim. “Images Showing Restoration of Soviet-Era Symbols in Mariupol Posted by Adviser to Mayor.” Kyiv Independent, 6 May 2022. https://egyptindependent.com/images-showing-restoration-of-soviet-era-symbols-in-mariupol-posted-by-adviser-to-mayor/.
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Lukyanov, Fyodor A., and Dmitry V. Yefremenko. “Politics of Memory, Kiev Style.” Global Affairs, 2017. https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/politics-of-memory-kiev-style/.
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Mälksoo, Lauri. “Patterns of Post-Soviet Russian State Practice in International Law,” [in:] Russian Approaches to International Law, ed. Lauri Mälksoo. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723042.003.0004.
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Meharg, Sarah Jane. Identicide: Precursor to Genocide. Working Paper No. 05. Ottawa: Carleton University, Centre for Security and Defence Studies, 2006.
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Mezentsev, Kostyantyn and Oleksiy Mezentsev. “War and the City: Lessons from Urbicide in Ukraine.” Czasopismo Geograficzne 93, No. 3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.12657/czageo-93-20.
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Mikhalkov, Serhii, and Nadia Kelm. “War on Pedestals: How Monuments Serve Propaganda in Modern Russia.” Texty.org.ua, January 7, 2025. https://texty.org.ua/articles/114168/war-on-pedestals-how-monuments-serve-russian-propaganda/.
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. “Reports – Foreign Policy.” Accessed September 16, 2025. https://mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/reports/2014247/.
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Monastyrskyi, Yevhenii, and John Vsetecka. “Russia Is Destroying Monuments as Part of War on Ukrainian Identity.” Atlantic Council – Ukraine Alert, August 6, 2024. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/russia-is-destroying-monuments-as-part-of-war-on-ukrainian-identity/.
    View in Google Scholar
  50. O’Keefe, Roger. “Protection of Cultural Property under International Criminal Law.” Melbourne Journal of International Law 11 (2010): 339-392.
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Office of the Prosecutor, International Criminal Court. Policy on Cultural Heritage. June 14, 2021.
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). Report on the Russian Occupation of Ukraine and its Aftermath: Human Rights Situation during the Occupation 24 February 2022-31 December 2023. March 20, 2024.
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Orkin, Mikhail, and Tristan Ferraro. “IHL and Occupied Territory.” Humanitarian Law & Policy Blog, July 26, 2022. https://blogs.icrc.org/law-and-policy/2022/07/26/armed-conflict-ukraine-ihl-occupied-territory/.
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Ovenden, Richard. “Putin’s War on Ukrainian Memory.” The Atlantic 2, No. 1 (2023): 1-5.
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Pellet, Alain. “The Destruction of Troy Will Not Take Place.” [in:] International Law and the Administration of Occupied Territories, ed. Emma Playfair, 169-180. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.
    View in Google Scholar
  56. Poberezhnyi, Vitalii. “Opinion: Why Russia’s Memory Policy in Occupied Territories Leaves Some Ukrainian Monuments Standing.” The Kyiv Independent, October 3, 2024. https://kyivindependent.com/opinion-why-russias-memory-policy-in-occupied-territories-leaves-some-ukrainian-monuments-standing/.
    View in Google Scholar
  57. President of Russia. Address by the President of the Russian Federation, February 24, 2022. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67843.
    View in Google Scholar
  58. Roberts, Adam. “Transformative Military Occupation: Applying the Laws of War and Human Rights.” The American Journal of International Law 100, No. 3 (2006): 580-622.
    View in Google Scholar
  59. Sassòli, Marco. “Legislation and Maintenance of Public Order and Civil Life by Occupying Powers.” European Journal of International Law 16 (2005): 661-694.
    View in Google Scholar
  60. Sergeytsev, Timofey. “What Should Russia Do with Ukraine?” The Ukrainian Post, April 5, 2025. https://ukrainianpost.com/opinions/272-what-should-russia-do-with-ukraine.
    View in Google Scholar
  61. Shaheed, Farida. Report of the Independent Expert in the Field of Cultural Rights, UN Doc. A/HRC/17/38, March 21, 2011.
    View in Google Scholar
  62. Shaheed, Farida. Report of the Independent Expert in the Field of Cultural Rights. UN Doc. A/HRC/14/36, March 22, 2010.
    View in Google Scholar
  63. Shaheed, Farida. Report of the Special Rapporteur in the Field of Cultural Rights. UN Doc. A/HRC/25/49, January 23, 2014, para. 64.
    View in Google Scholar
  64. Shultz, Daniel, and Christopher Jasparro. “How Does Russia Exploit History and Cultural Heritage for Information Warfare? Recommendations for NATO.” Antiquities Coalition Think Tank Policy Brief 11, April 1, 2022. https://acthinktank.scholasticahq.com/article/118601-how-does-russia-exploit-history-and-cultural-heritage-for-information-warfare-recommendations-for-nato.
    View in Google Scholar
  65. State Duma of the Russian Federation. “Members of the State Duma Adopt Statement Condemning Initiative to Dismantle Soviet Era Monument.” State Duma News, April 1, 2024. https://duma.gov.ru/en/news/58628/.
    View in Google Scholar
  66. Stewart, Katie. “Erection and Demolition of Monuments in Russian East European Memory Wars.” PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo, December 9, 2024. https://www.ponarseurasia.org/erection-and-demolition-of-monuments-in-russian-east-european-memory-wars/.
    View in Google Scholar
  67. Strana.ua. “У Лисичанську відновили знесений пам'ятник радянському маршалу Климу Ворошилову.” March 21, 2023. https://strana.today/ukr/news/428755-u-lisichansku-vidnovili-pamjatnik-klimu-voroshilovu.html.
    View in Google Scholar
  68. The Moscow Times. “The Russians Destroyed a Monument to Holodomor Victims in Temporarily Occupied Mariupol.” October 21, 2022. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2022/10/20/vodka-gift-berlusconi-in-fresh-row-over-putin-ties-a79138.
    View in Google Scholar
  69. Ukrainian World Congress. “Russians Alter Identity of Occupied Territories through Replacement of Monuments.” February 12, 2025. https://www.ukrainianworldcongress.org/russians-alter-identity-of-occupied-territories-through-replacement-of-monuments/.
    View in Google Scholar
  70. Ukrainska Pravda. Zahorodnii, Mykhailo. “Russians in Occupied Mariupol Put Up Monument to Alexander Nevsky in Place of Memorial to Ukrainian Soldiers – Mayor’s Adviser.” September 12, 2022. https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2022/09/12/7367145/.
    View in Google Scholar
  71. UN Human Rights Council. Report of the Special Rapporteur in the Field of Cultural Rights. UN Doc. A/HRC/31/59, February 3, 2016.
    View in Google Scholar
  72. United Nations General Assembly. Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 2 March 2022: ES 11/1. Aggression against Ukraine. A/RES/ES 11/1.
    View in Google Scholar
  73. Voice of Crimea. “Політика монументальної пропаганди російської окупаційної влади на Кримському півострові.” November 18, 2020. https://voicecrimea.com.ua/main/articles/politika-monumentalnoї-propagandi-rosijskoї-okupacijnoї-vladi-na-krimskomu-pivostrovi.html#_ftn1.
    View in Google Scholar
  74. Vorobiova, Anastasiia. “The ‘Crimea Scenario’: How the Russian Federation Is Destroying the Ukrainian Identity of Children in Territories.” Almenda, February 20, 2023. https://almenda.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Analytical-report-The-’Crimea-scenario-how-the-Russian-Federation-is-destroying-the-Ukrainian-identity-of-children-in-the-occupied-territories.pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  75. Webster, Scott. “Revisiting Memoricide: The Everyday Killing of Memory.” Memory Studies 17, No. 3 (2024): 1408-1428.
    View in Google Scholar
  76. Yefremenko, Dmitry V. “Mnemonic Security Dilemma. Memory as Casus Belli.” Russia in Global Affairs 20, No. 4 (2022): 142-164.
    View in Google Scholar
  77. Zadorozhnyy, Tim. “Russia Erects Stalin Monument in Occupied Melitopol to Mark Victory Day.” Kyiv Independent, May 9 , 2025. https://kyivindependent.com/russia-erects-stalin-monument-in-occupied-melitopol-to-mark-victory-day/.
    View in Google Scholar
  78. Zhurzhenko, Tatiana. “Krieg und Erinnerung im postsowjetischen Raum: Bewaffnung ohne Grenzen?” Ukraine & Beyond – Körber Stiftung, March 29, 2022.
    View in Google Scholar
  79. ДСНЮС. “Окупанти знесли пам'ятник Шевченку в Мелітополі: у місті прогримів вибух (ФОТО).” January 14, 2023. https://www.dsnews.ua/ukr/politics/okupanti-znesli-pam-yatnik-shevchenku-v-melitopoli-u-misti-progrimiv-vibuh-foto-14012023-472562.
    View in Google Scholar
  80. КонсультантПлюс. Федеральный закон Российской Федерации “О внесении изменений в отдельные законодательные акты Российской Федерации,” № 485-ФЗ от 2022 г. https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_485830/09ef1ff92a24b247084806b8964151e371af66b6/.
    View in Google Scholar
  81. Орлова, Віолетта. “Під Маріуполем окупанти знесли пам'ятник гетьману Сагайдачному (відео).” УНІАН, May 7, 2022. https://www.unian.ua/war/u-mangushi-pid-mariupolem-okupanti-znesli-pam-yatnik-sagaydachnomu-video-novini-vtorgnennya-rosiji-v-ukrajinu-11817264.html.
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.