logo czasopisma

Artykuły

online-first

The Status of Government Administration in the Sphere of Crisis Management

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36128/48wmzt46
Przesłane
11 kwietnia 2025
Opublikowane
19-12-2025 — zaktualizowane 20-12-2025
Wersje

Abstrakt

The status of the government administration in crisis management is determined by its legal and constitutional position, as well as its location at central and local levels. This allows for the comprehensive implementation of tasks and a response to threats. Local government administration operates within the voivodeship, where the voivode is responsible for crisis management. In municipalities and districts, these tasks are carried out by the local government. This paper uses a dogmatic-legal approach to analyse the legal regulations governing crisis management and indicate the role of government administration in this area. A literature review was also conducted to inform the analysis. To cite examples from other countries, the methodology was supplemented with elements of the comparative method.

Bibliografia

  1. Albahri A. S., Yahya Layth Khaleel, Mustafa Abdulfattah Habeeb, Reem D. Ismael, Qabas A. Hameed, Muhammet Deveci, Raad Z. Homod, O. S. Albahri, A. H. Alamoodi, Laith Alzubaidi, “A Systematic Review of Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence Applications in Natural Disasters” Computers and Electrical Engineering, 118 (2024): 109409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109409.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  2. Ansell Christopher, Eva Sørensen, Jacob Torfing, “Public Administration and Politics Meet Turbulence: The Search for Robust Governance Responses” Public Administration, No. 1 (2023): 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12874.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  3. Attard-Frost Blair, Ana Brandusescu, Kelly Lyons, “The Governance of Artificial Intelligence in Canada: Findings and Opportunities from a Review of 84 AI Governance Initiatives” Government Information Quarterly, No. 2 (2024): 101929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101929.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  4. Błaś Adam, Jan Boć, Jan Jeżewski, Administracja Publiczna. Wrocław: Kolonia Limited, 2003.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  5. Carayannopoulos George, “Whole of Government: The Solution to Managing Crises?” Australian Journal of Public Administration, No. 2 (2017): 251-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12227.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  6. Christensen Tom, Ole Andreas Danielsen, Per Lægreid, Lise H. Rykkja, “Comparing Coordination Structures for Crisis Management in Six Countries” Public Administration, No. 2 (2016): 316-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12186.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  7. Christensen Tom, Per Lægreid, Lise H. Rykkja, “The Co-Evolution of Reputation Management, Governance Capacity, Legitimacy and Accountability in Crisis Management”, [in:] The Routledge Companion to Risk, Crisis and Emergency Management, ed. Robert P. Gephart, C. Chet Miller, Karin Svedberg Helgesson. 177-191. New York: Routledge, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315458175-15.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  8. Cieslak Zbigniew, Marek Wierzbowski, Prawo administracyjne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Prawnicze PWN, 1997.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  9. Czuryk Małgorzata, “Activities of the Local Government During a State of Natural Disaster” Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, No. 4 (2021): 111-124 https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2021.30.4.111-124.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  10. Czuryk Małgorzata, “Dopuszczalne różnicowanie sytuacji pracowników ze względu na religię, wyznanie lub światopogląd” Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego, No. 27 (2024): 151-163. Doi: 10.31743/spw.17518.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  11. Czuryk Małgorzata, ”Restrictions on the Exercising of Human and Civil Rights and Freedoms Due to Cybersecurity Issues” Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, No. 3 (2022): 31-43. https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2022.31.3.31-43.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  12. Czuryk Małgorzata, „Cybersecurity and Protection of Critical Infrastructure” Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, No. 5 (2023): 43-52. https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2023.32.5.43-52.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  13. Czuryk Małgorzata, „Status prawny samorządu terytorialnego w sferze zarządzania kryzysowego” Cybersecurity and Law, No. 2 (2024): 174-186. https://doi.org/10.35467/cal/188567.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  14. Eid Mahmoud, Toby Fyfe, “Globalisation and Crisis Communication: Competencies for Decision-Making in the Government of Canada” The Journal of International Communication, No. 2 (2009): 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2009.9674748.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  15. Gaie Christophe, Mirosław Karpiuk, Andrea Spaziani, „Cybersecurity in France, Poland and Italy” Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, No. 1 (2025): 73-95.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  16. Gaie Christophe, Mirosław Karpiuk, Nicola Strizzolo, „Cybersecurity of Public Sector Institutions” Prawo i Więź, No. 6 (2024): 347-362. https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI53.1129.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  17. Grabowski Bogdan, „Cyfrowe zagrożenia – zarys problemu” Ius et Securitas, No. 1 (2024): 95-105.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  18. Izdebski Hubert, Michał Kulesza, Administracja publiczna: zagadnienia ogólne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Liber, 2004.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  19. Izdebski Hubert, „Od administracji publicznej do public governance” Zarządzanie Publiczne, No. 1 (2007): 7-20.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  20. Kaczmarek Krzysztof, Mirosław Karpiuk, Claudio Melchior, “A Holistic Approach to Cybersecurity and Data Protection in the Age of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data” Prawo i Więź, No. 3 (2024): 103-121. https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI50.907.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  21. Kaczmarek Krzysztof, Mirosław Karpiuk, Urszula Soler, “The Potential Use of Artificial Intelligence in Crisis Management” Sicurezza, Terrorismo e Societa, No. 2 (2024): 141-151.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  22. Kaczmarek Krzysztof, “Finland in the Light of Cyber Threats in the Context of Russia’s Aggression Against Ukraine” Cybersecurity and Law, No. 1 (2023): 204-214.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  23. Kaczmarek Krzysztof, “Nordic Countries in the Face of Digital Threats” Cybersecurity and Law, No. 1 (2024): 151-161.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  24. Kaczmarek Krzysztof, “Wpływ zmian klimatycznych na bezpieczeństwo” Journal of Modern Science, No. 4 (2024): 410-430. https://doi.org/10.13166/jms/192195.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  25. Karpiuk Mirosław, ”Glosa do wyroku Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego z dnia 12 lutego 2018 r. (II OSK 2524/17)” Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, No. 1 (2019): 185-194. 10.17951/sil.2019.28.1.185-194.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  26. Karpiuk Mirosław, ”Recognising an Entity as an Operator of Essential Services and Providing Cybersecurity at the National Level” Prawo i Więź, No. 4 (2022): 166-179. https://doi.org/10.36128/priw.vi42.524.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  27. Knopek Jacek, Ewa Maria Włodyka, “Obraz partycypacji organizacji pozarządowych w tworzeniu polityk publicznych w województwie zachodniopomorskim” Przegląd Zachodniopomorski, No. 1 (2020): 97-113. https://doi.org/10.18276/pz.2020.1-06.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  28. Melo Zurita, Maria De Lourdes, Brian Cook, Louise Harms, Alan March, “Towards New Disaster Governance: Subsidiarity as a Critical Tool” Environmental Policy and Governance, No. 6 (2015): 386-398. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1681.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  29. Mroziński Juliusz, “Autonomy of Law in the European Conception of the Legal State” Rocznik Administracji Publicznej, 10 (2024): 59-72. https://doi.org/10.4467/24497800RAP.24.004.20222.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  30. Najwyższa Izba Kontroli, Wykonywanie Przez Organy Administracji Publicznej Zadań w Zakresie Zarządzania Kryzysowego, Nr Ewid.: 146/2011/P/10/006/KAP, 2011.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  31. Nouri Jafar, Manouchehr Omidvari, S. M. Tehrani, “Risk Assessment and Crisis Management in Gas Stations” International Journal of Environmental Research, No. 1 (2010): 143-152.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  32. OECD Risk Management: Strategic Crisis Management. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance. Vol. 23. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, 29 August 2013. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k41rbd1lzr7-en.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  33. Płonka-Bielenin Katarzyna, “Instytucja zarządzania kryzysowego w Polsce – założenia i rzeczywistość” Przegląd Prawa Publicznego, No. 7-8 (2017): 152-160.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  34. Rosenthal Uri, Alexander Kouzmin, “Crises and Crisis Management: Toward Comprehensive Government Decision Making” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, No. 2 (1997): 277-304. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024349.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  35. Schomaker Rahel M., Michael W. Bauer, “What Drives Successful Administrative Performance during Crises? Lessons from Refugee Migration and the Covid‐19 Pandemic” Public Administration Review, No. 5 (2020): 845-850. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13280.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  36. Shi Peijun, “On the Role of Government in Integrated Disaster Risk Governance—Based on Practices in China” International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, No. 3 (2012): 139-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-012-0014-2.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  37. Straub Vincent J., Deborah Morgan, Jonathan Bright, Helen Margetts, “Artificial Intelligence in Government: Concepts, Standards, and a Unified Framework”, Government Information Quarterly, No. 4 (2023): 101881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101881.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  38. Tanesab Janiscus Pieter, “Institutional Effectiveness and Inclusions: Public Perceptions on Indonesia’s Disaster Management Authorities” International Journal of Disaster Management, No. 2 (2020): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.24815/ijdm.v3i2.17621.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  39. Tkaczyk Edyta, “Bezpieczeństwo państwa w Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. Refleksje nad dobrem chronionym” Ius et Securitas, No. 1 (2024): 42-50.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  40. Velichko, Larisa, and Dmytro Kashchenko. “Specific Activities of Public Authority Bodies in Emergency and Crisis Situations”. Theory and Practice of Public Administration, No. 2 (27 November 2023): 7–21. https://doi.org/10.26565/1727-6667-2023-2-01.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  41. Wierzbowski Marek, Jacek Jagielski, Jacek Lang, Artur Nowak-Far, Aleksandra Wiktorowska Dyl, Marcin, Piotr Przybysz Stankiewicz, Rafal Robert, Pawel Wajda et al., Prawo administracyjne. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2015.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  42. Wiśniewski Michał, “Analysis of the Integrity of District Crisis Management Plans in Poland” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, No. 67 (2022): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102650.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  43. Włodyka Ewa Maria, “Implementation of E-Government and Artificial Intelligence in Polish Public Administration” TalTech Journal of European Studies, No. 2 (2024): 118-136. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2024-0019.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  44. Włodyka Ewa Maria, “Senior Policy in Polish Legislation on the Example of Local Government Seniors Councils (Taking into Account the Amendment of 2023)” Orbeliani Law Review, No. 1 (2025): 19-35. https://doi.org/10.52340/olr.2024.03.01.02.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  45. Wojciechowski Tomasz, „Cyberbezpieczeństwo i dezinformacja we współczesnym świecie: strategie ochrony i zarządzania kryzysowego” Ius et Securitas, No. 1 (2024): 83-94.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  46. Wong Catherine Mei Ling, Olivia Jensen, “The Paradox of Trust: Perceived Risk and Public Compliance during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Singapore” Journal of Risk Research, No. 7-8 (2020): 1021-1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1756386.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  47. Zimmermann Jan, Prawo administracyjne. 9nd ed. Seria Akademicka. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2020.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.