logo czasopisma

Artykuły

Tom 61 Nr 2 (2026): Prawo i Więź

Francuski model ochrony sygnalistów a kształtowanie europejskich standardów ich ochrony

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36128/hd5qn702
Przesłane
1 grudnia 2025
Opublikowane
09-05-2026

Abstrakt

The French whistleblower protection model is considered one of the most advanced and comprehensive systems in Europe. It is based on the Sapin II Act of 2016 and its 2022 amendment, introducing a flexible reporting procedure, broad protection against retaliation, a requirement for good faith, and legal and psychological support for whistleblowers. The model emphasizes confidentiality and data protection in line with GDPR requirements. It also takes a balanced approach to business secrecy, allowing for the disclosure of significant legal violations in the public interest. France played a key role in shaping the EU Directive 2019/1937, which incorporates many elements of the French system. Despite progress, practical challenges remain, such as low employee awareness and lengthy legal proceedings. The article highlights differences between the French and U.S. models and notes the trend of European whistleblower protection converging towards the French model, focusing on protection, support, and prevention of retaliation.

Bibliografia

  1. Bourdon, William. Petit manuel de désobéissance citoyenne. Paris: JC Lattès, 2014.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  2. Buy, Frédéric. “Lanceurs d’alerte et secrets d’affaires: Que fait-on des accords de confidentialité?” W Les lanceurs d’alerte: Quelle protection juridique? Quelles limites? LGDJ, 2017.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  3. Daoud, Emmanuel i Solène Sfoggia. “Lanceurs d’alerte et entreprises: les enjeux de la loi Sapin II.” AJ Pénal, 2017.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  4. Fasterling, Björn. “Whistleblower Protection: A Comparative Law Perspective.” W International Handbook on Whistleblowing Research, red. A.J. Brown, David Lewis i Richard Moberly. Edward Elgar, 2014.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  5. Foegle, Jean-Philippe. “Le lanceur d’alerte dans l’Union européenne: démocratie, management, vulnérabilité(s).” W Les lanceurs d’alerte: Quelle protection juridique? Quelles limites?, red. Mathieu Disant i Delphine Pollet-Panoussis. LGDJ, 2017.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  6. Garinot, Jean-Marie. “Secret des affaires: la loi ne chasse pas le contrat.” AJ Contrat (2018).
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  7. Hajn, Zbigniew i Dagmara Skupień. “Ochrona sygnalistów w miejscu pracy w państwach Grupy Wyszehradzkiej, Francji i Słowenii – propozycje zmian.” Przegląd Prawa i Administracji, t. CXXIII (2020).
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  8. Lachapelle, Amélie. “Le lancement d’alerte (whistleblowing), une atteinte au secret financier voulue par l’autorité?” Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé 71, nr 1 (2019): 65–106. https://doi.org/10.3406/ridc.2019.21035
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  9. Lemonnier, Mariola. “Wybrane cechy modelu ochrony sygnalistów na przykładzie amerykańskiego rynku regulowanego.” Prawo i Więź, nr 5 (48) (2025): 87–106. https://doi.org/10.36128/fm7xjj31
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  10. Moreau, Mathieu. La protection juridique des lanceurs d’alerte en France. Paris: Dalloz, 2020.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  11. de Quenaudon, René i Marie-José Gomez-Mustel. “L’ambiguïté des dispositifs d’alerte professionnelle en France.” Semaine Sociale Lamy, BS 4/10 (2010).
    Pokaż w Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.