Artykuły
Tom 62 Nr 3 (2026): Prawo i Więź
Ciągłość i zmiana, czyli fenomen monarchii brytyjskiej
Abstrakt
This essay examines the British monarchy as a unique institution that has endured for centuries by balancing tradition with adaptation, maintaining a significant role in the UK’s political and social system. It begins by contextualizing European monarchies, noting their political marginalization in the democratic era, where monarchs must adapt to the “will of the people” to survive. The British monarchy stands out for its adaptability, rooted in the flexibility of the UK’s unwritten constitution, which blends historical continuity with dynamic evolution. Drawing on thinkers like Edmund Burke, Walter Bagehot, David Cannadine, Vernon Bogdanor, and Martin Loughlin, the essay explores the monarchy’s evolution from a divinely sanctioned institution to a symbol of national identity and democratic legitimacy. Burke highlights the constitution’s organic development, Bagehot distinguishes its “dignified” and “efficient” roles, and modern scholars like Bogdanor emphasize the monarchy’s neutral role in democracy. Cannadine underscores its ability to create unifying rituals, particularly in the imperial and post-colonial eras. The essay also addresses contemporary challenges, such as lower support among younger generations and ethnic minorities and its role in the Commonwealth. It argues that the monarchy’s success lies in its ability to balance conservatism and modernism, ensuring its relevance in a changing world. The conclusion suggests that the monarchy’s future hinges on continued adaptation, especially amid demographic shifts and potential republican sentiments.
Bibliografia
- Abraham Tanya, What do Ethnic Minority Britons Think of the Monarchy and Royal Family?. https://yougov.co.uk/society/articles/45655-what-do-ethnic-minority-britons-think-monarchy-and.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- Bagehot Walter, The English Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2001.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- Bogdanor Vernon, „The Constitutional Monarchy in the United Kingdom” Res Publica, nr 1 (1991): 7-23.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- Bogdanor Vernon, „The Guardian has got it Wrong” The Guardian, 6 grudnia 2000. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/dec/06/monarchy.comment8.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- Bogdanor Vernon, The Monarchy and the Constitution. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- British Constitution in the Twentieth Century, red. Vernon Bogdanor. London: British Academy, 2003.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- Burke Edmund, Odwołanie od nowych do starych wigów, tłum. Agnieszka Wincewicz-Price. Kraków: Ośrodek Myśli Politycznej, 2015.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- Burke Edmund, Rozważania o rewolucji we Francji, tłum. Dorota Lachowska. Kraków: Znak, 1994.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- Cannadine David, History in Our Past. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1998.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- Cannadine David, Ornamentalism: How the British Saw Their Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- Dicey Albert V., Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. London: Macmillan, 1915.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- Gladstone William E., Gleanings of Past Years, 1848–78, t. I. London: John Murray, 1879.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- Griffith John A.G., „The Common Law and the Political Constitution” Modern Law Review t. XLII (1979).
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- Hazell Robert, Bob Morris, The Role of Monarchy in Modern Democracy. Oxford-LondonNew York-New Delhi-Sydney: Hart, 2020.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- Loughin Martin, Against Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2022.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- Loughin Martin, The British Constitution: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- Moodie Graeme C., „The Monarch and the Selection of a Prime Minister: A Re-Examination of the Crisis of 1931” Political Studies, 5 (1957).
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- Selected Speeches of the Late Right Honourable the Earl of Beaconsfield, t. I, London: Longman, Green, and Co., 1882.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- The Invention of Tradition, red. Eric Hobsbawm, Terence Ranger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- The Nature of the Crown: A Legal and Political Analysis, red. Maurice Sunkin, Sebastian Payne. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- Tulejski Tomasz, Tomasz Banach, Republika Rzymska i Wielka Brytania. Kilka uwag na temat konstytucji niepisanej. Łódź: Wydawnictwo UŁ, 2022.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- Turkheimer Teresa, „Democracy, Constitutionalism, and the Commonwealth. In Conversation with Professor Vernon Bogdanor” The Cambrigde Journal of Law, Politics, and Art, 2022. https://www.cjlpa.org/post/in-conversation-with-professor-vernon-bogdanor.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- Weston Corinne C., Janelle R. Greenberg, Subjects and Sovereigns: The Grand Controversy over Legal Sovereignty in Stuart England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
- Whitelock Anna, „As a Historian of Monarchy, I thought I was Immune to its Magic. Not Today” The Guardian, 19 września 2022. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/sep/19/queen-elizabeth-ii-funeral-monarchy-history.
Pokaż w Google Scholar
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.