Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 57 No. 4 (2025): Prawo i Więź nr 4 (57) 2025

The Legal Status of Administrative Staff in the Statutes of Polish Universities

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI57.1357
Submitted
19 May 2025
Published
06-10-2025

Abstract

This paper aims to analyse the legal status of non-academic staff (NAS) within the statutes of public academic institutions in Poland. Although they are formally part of the academic community, NAS are often marginalised in institutional practices and internal organisational regulations. The authors, using a formal-dogmatic method and quantitative-qualitative, examined 101 academic statutes of public universities. First, artificial intelligence tools were used to make a preliminary selection of the 20 most diverse statutes in terms of regulations concerning NNA. Next, using the MAXQDA tool, a qualitative analysis of the selected statutes was carried out in terms of: a) the place of NNA in the university community and their definition as a group of employees; b) the representation of NNA in university senates; c) representation in the electoral college; and d) other regulations. This paper contributes to debates on egalitarianism and the recognition of diverse professional roles within academia. The results of the analysis were used to formulate recommendations and proposals de lege ferenda.

References

  1. Bamber Matthew, Jacquelyn Allen-Collinson, Jon McCormack, „Occupational Limbo, Transitional Liminality and Permanent Liminality: New Conceptual Distinctions” Human Relations, nr 12 (2017): 1514-1537.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Baran Krzysztof, „Akademickie prawo zatrudnienia. Komentarz”, [w:] Akademickie prawo zatrudnienia, red. Krzysztof Baran. 25-29. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2019.
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Bocheńska Aleksandra, „Art. 112”, [w:] Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce. Komentarz, red. Aleksander Jakubowski. 336-338. Warszawa: C. H. Beck, 2023.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Choi Jonathan, Daniel Schwarcz, „AI Assistance in Legal Analysis: An Empirical Study” Journal of Legal Education, nr 2 (2025): 384-420.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Cywińska Maria, Katarzyna Górak-Sosnowska, Urszula Markowska-Manista, „Decolonising Those Who Are Not in Polish HEIs”, [w:] Leading Change in Gender and Diversity in Higher Education: From Margins to Mainstream, red. Anna CohenMiller, Tamsin Hinton-Smith, Fawzia Haeri Mazanderani, Nupur Samuel. 208-232. London: Routledge, 2023.
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Degtyarova Iryna, Jerzy Woźnicki, „Competition vs. Searching as a Mechanism of the Rector’s Selection” Journal of Institutional Research, nr 1 (2018): 19-39. https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2018-0008.
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Górak-Sosnowska Katarzyna, Lidia Tomaszewska, „Rola dziekanatów w tworzeniu wewnętrznych aktów normatywnych na uczelniach” Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, nr 4 (2020): 57-68. https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2020.25.04.04.
    View in Google Scholar
  8. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research Ethics. red. Iphofen Rob, Martin Tolich. London: SAGE, 2019.
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Jędrzejewski Tomasz, „Komentarz do art. 112”, [w:] Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce. Komentarz, red. Jerzy Woźnicki. 307-309. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2019.
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Kerridge Simon, „Is Research Management and Administration (RMA) a Profession?” Journal of Research Management and Administration, nr 1 (2023): 030220231. https://doi.org/10.18552/jorma.v2i1.927.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Kolek Antoni, „University Managers or Academic Leaders: Rectors of Prestigious Universities” Research in Social Sciences, nr 1 (2025): 33-42. https://doi.org/10.53935/26415305.v8i1.292.
    View in Google Scholar
  12. MacDonald Ginger Phillips, „Theorizing University Identity Development: Multiple Perspectives and Common Goals” Higher Education, 65 (2013): 153-166.
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Machnikowska Anna, „Administracja w uczelni akademickiej”, [w:] Innowacje i konserwatyzm 2.0. Polskie uczelnie w procesie przemian, red. Dominik Antonowicz, Anna Machnikowska, Adam Szot. 133-151. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, 2020.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Peoples Lee, „Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analysis: Implications for Legal Education and the Profession” (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.03487.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Sekuła Zofia, „Nowe tendencje w wartościowaniu pracy” Przegląd Organizacji, 7/8 (2010): 67-70. https://doi.org/10.33141/po.2010.78.15.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Veles Natalia, Caroll Graham, Claire Ovaska, „University Professional Staff Roles, Identities, and Spaces of Interaction: Systematic Review of Literature Published in 2000–2020” Policy Reviews in Higher Education, nr 2 (2023): 127-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2023.2193826.
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Velychko Oleksandr, Liudmyla Velychko, „Matrix Structures in Management of Quality of Educational and Scientific Work of Ukrainian Universities” Problems and Perspectives in Management, nr 1 (2018): 133-144.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Weichbroth Paweł, „AI and the Law: Evaluating ChatGPT’s Performance in Legal Classification” (2025). https://arxiv.org/html/2502.12193.
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Whitchurch Celia, Healy Grace, „The concept of third space as an enabler in complex higher education environments” London Review of Education, nr 4 (2024). https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.22.1.42.
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Wilkinson David, Mike Thelwall, „Researching Personal Information on the Public Web: Methods and Ethics” Social Science Computer Review, 29 (2010): 387-401.
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Woleński Jan, „Uczelnie jako wspólnota nauczających i uczących się”, [w:] Debaty PAU. Uczelnie w służbie społeczeństwu, red. Leszek Suchanek, t. VI. 52-61. Kraków: Wydawnictwo PAU, 2019.
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Woźniak Piotr, „Podejście procesowe w systemie zarządzania uczelnią”, [w:] XVIII konferencja pt. Innowacje w zarządzaniu i inżynierii produkcji. Zakopane, 1–3 marca 2015 r., 481–488. http://46.242.185.119/off_ptzp.org.pl/files/konferencje/kzz/artyk_pdf_2014/T2/t2_48.pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Zawadzki Marcin, „Między neoliberalizmem a feudalizmem. Godność młodych naukowców w kontekście transformacji polskiego uniwersytetu” Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe, nr 1 (2017): 133-154. https://doi.org/10.14746/nisw.2017.1.7.
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Ziółkowska Agnieszka, „Sądowoadministracyjna kontrola orzeczeń odwoławczych komisji dyscyplinarnych wydanych w postępowaniu dyscyplinarnym prowadzonym w stosunku do studentów i doktorantów” Prawo i Więź, nr 2 (2024): 329-360. https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI49.365.
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.