Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

No. 2 (36) (2021)

Synthetic Concept of Law

Submitted
11 July 2021
Published
21-07-2021

Abstract

The article is devoted to the justification of the synthetic concept of legal understanding on the example of the conservative legal ideology of Russia. The study proves the peculiarity of the Russian traditionalist concept of law based on the works of domestic conservatives, analyzes approaches to legal understanding through the prism of traditional settings, assuming the unity of religion, morality, and law in the form of the concept of „truth”. The hypothesis that the legal understanding in Russian conservatism is a unique synthetic theory of law differs from combining natural law, positivist, and sociological concepts of legal understanding, which are alien to one another. Thus, the main postulates of the synthetic concept of law are put forward. First, the basic idea of the synthetic concept of law is to balance the formal law and the inner moral, religious, moral, and ethical attitudes of man. In other words, the action of law and other social regulators must be in inseparable unity. Secondly, the synthetic concept of law emphasizes the importance of considering people’s identity and traditional legal attitudes. The method of absorption of cultures prefers the synthesis of the best achievements of political and legal thought of different cultures. Third, the synthetic concept of law is of an applied nature. Our analysis revealed a correlation between the secularization of society and the decreasing role of traditional regulators, between the predominance of law and the growth of crime, and between the expansion of state coercion and the decline in the social order. Consequently, to increase the role of other social regulators, to increase the degree of social order and to reduce crime, law must incorporate spiritual principles to be an element of living, the organic connection of religion, morality (tradition), and formal law in a single regulator „Truth”.

References

  1. Aksakov K. S., Collected Works. Moscow: P. Bakhmetev, 1889.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Berman G. J., Western Tradition of Law. The era of formation. Moscow: Infra-M, 1998.
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Varlamova N.V. „Russian theory of law in search of a paradigm” Journal of Russian Law, 12 (2009): 68-84.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Grafsky V. G. „Integral (Synthesized) Jurisprudence: Actual and Still Unfinished Project” Jurisprudence, 3 (2000): 49-64.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Ilyin I. A., Collected Works. Moscow: Russian kniga, 1994.
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Kireevsky I. V., In response, A.S. Khomyakov. Moscow: Institute of Russian Civilization, 2007.
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Kozlikhin I. Yu. „Integral jurisprudence: controversial issues” Philosophy of Law in Russia: History and Modernity, (2009): 249-250.
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Lazarev V.V., Selected Works. Moscow: New Justice, 2010.
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Lukovskaya, D. I., Razuvaev, N.V. „Political and legal ideas of pre-Socratics: preconditions for the emergence and development” Jurisprudence, 6 (2014.): 236-256.
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Nasyrov R.V., „On the relationship between the ancient and modern European interpretations of natural law” Russian Law Journal, 4 (2008): 56-64.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Pobedonostsev K. P., The great lie of our time. Moscow: ANO Development of spirituality, culture and science, 2004.
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Polyakov A.V., „Communicative theory of law as a variant of integral legal thinking” Legal Ideas and Institutions in Historical and Theoretical Discourse, 2008.
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Polyakov A.V., „Russian theoretical and legal thought” Our Hard Way to Law, (2006): 119-136.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Polyakov A.V., What ideology does Russia need? St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Publishing House, 2002.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Polyakov A.V., General theory of law: problems of interpretation in the context of a communicative approach. Moscow: Prospect, 2016.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Polyakov A.V., General theory of law: phenomenological and communicative approach. St. Petersburg: Legal Center Press, 2003.
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Semitko A.P., „Russian legal culture: mythological and socio-economic origins and preconditions” State and Law, 3 (1992).
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Sorokin V.V., The concept and essence of law in the spiritual culture of Russia. Moscow: Jurlitinform, 2006.
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.