logo czasopisma

Articles

Vol. 55 No. 2 (2025): Law and Social Bonds no. 2 (55) 2025

The Use of Interdisciplinary Approach in International Law Study in the Digital Era 5.0: Highlights and Future Research Directions

Submitted
5 March 2025
Published
05-06-2025

Abstract

International law faces numerous complex and novel challenges in the context of globalization and rapid technological advancements. This paper analyses the importance and potential of applying an interdisciplinary approach in international law research in the Digital Era 5.0. The results show that this method can enhance in-depth research on the relationship between international law and related fields, effectively address emerging legal challenges, improve the practicality of legal proposals, promote international cooperation in research, and enhance the ability to resolve international conflicts and disputes. The paper also identifies future research trends, including the application of artificial intelligence, blockchain, and other emerging technologies in international law research. The paper emphasises the development and refinement of interdisciplinary research methods to effectively respond to international legal challenges in the Digital Era 5.0.

References

  1. Abbott Kenneth W., Duncan Snidal, “The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State”, [in:] Research Handbook on Global Governance, edited by Ngaire Woods. 44-88. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Alschner Wolfgang, Julie Seiermann, Dmitriy Skougarevskiy, “Text-as-Data Analysis of Preferential Trade Agreements: Mapping the PTA Landscape” Journal of International Economic Law, No. 2 (2017): 233-258.
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Ashley Kevin D., Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics: New Tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Theory and Method in Socio-Legal Research. ed. Reza Banakar, Max Travers. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Berman Paul Schiff, Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law Beyond Borders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Bianchi Andrea, International Law Theories: An Inquiry into Different Ways of Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Bix Brian, “Law and Language: How Words Mislead Us” Jurisprudence, No. 2 (2018): 293-308.
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Bodansky Daniel, “The Paris Climate Change Agreement: A New Hope?” American Journal of International Law, No. 2 (2016): 288-319.
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Bouvier Virginia M. Peace Talks with the ELN. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace, 2015.
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Boyd Danah, Kate Crawford, “Critical Questions for Big Data: Provocations for a Cultural, Technological, and Scholarly Phenomenon” Information, Communication & Society, No. 5 (2012): 662-679.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Trade Governance in the Digital Age: World Trade Forum, ed. Mira Burri, Thomas Cottier. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Cath Catelijne, Sandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Luciano Floridi, “Artificial Intelligence and the ‘Good Society’: The US, EU, and UK Approach” Science and Engineering Ethics, No. 2 (2018): 505-528.
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Clark Phil, The Gacaca Courts, Post-Genocide Justice and Reconciliation in Rwanda: Justice Without Lawyers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Cohen Julie E., Between Truth and Power: The Legal Constructions of Informational Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. De Filippi Primavera, Aaron Wright. Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Dunk Frans G. von der, “Effective Exercise of ‘In-Space Jurisdiction’: The US Approach and the Problems It Is Facing” Journal of Space Law, No. 1-2 (2015): 147-185.
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Erdélyi Olivia J., Judy Goldsmith, “Regulating Artificial Intelligence: Proposal for a Global Solution”, [in:] Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 95-101. New York: ACM, 2018.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Floridi Luciano, Josh Cowls, “A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society” Harvard Data Science Review, No. 1 (2019).
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Fukuyama Mieko, “Society 5.0: Aiming for a New Human-Centered Society” Japan Spotlight, 1 (2018): 47-50.
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Hirsch Moshe, “Invitation to the Sociology of International Law” University of Toronto Law Journal, No. 1 (2020): 1-30.
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Houben Robby, Alexander Snyers, Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain: Legal Context and Implications for Financial Crime, Money Laundering and Tax Evasion. Brussels: European Parliament, 2018.
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Ienca Marcello, Roberto Andorno, “Towards New Human Rights in the Age of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology” Life Sciences, Society and Policy, No. 1 (2017): 5.
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Jessup Philip C., Transnational Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1956.
    View in Google Scholar
  24. The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, ed. Christopher Kuner, Lee A. Bygrave, Christopher Docksey. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Lessig Lawrence, Code: Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books, 2006.
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Law as Data: Computation, Text, and the Future of Legal Analysis, ed. Michael A. Livermore, Daniel N. Rockmore. Santa Fe: Santa Fe Institute Press, 2019.
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Merry Sally Engle, The Seductions of Quantification: Measuring Human Rights, Gender Violence, and Sex Trafficking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020.
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Michaels Ralf, Beyond the State? Rethinking Private Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Mitchell George J., Making Peace. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Mueller Milton L., Networks and States: The Global Politics of Internet Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010.
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Orford Anne, “International Law and the Limits of History”, [in:] The Law of International Lawyers: Reading Martti Koskenniemi, ed. Wouter Werner, Marieke de Hoon, Alexis Galán. 297-320. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Pauwelyn Joost, Ramses A. Wessel, Jan Wouters, Informal International Lawmaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Posner Richard A., Economic Analysis of Law. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2014.
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Roberts Anthea, Paul B. Stephan, Pierre-Hugues Verdier, Mila Versteeg, Comparative International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Ryngaert Cedric, Duco W. Hora Siccama, “Extraterritorial Law Enforcement: The Changing Nature of Sovereignty and Self-Defense” Leiden Journal of International Law, No. 4 (2018): 795-819.
    View in Google Scholar
  36. International Investment Law and Development: Bridging the Gap. ed. Stephan W. Schill, Christian J. Tams, Rainer Hofmann. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015.
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations, ed. Michael N. Schmitt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Schwab Klaus, The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2016.
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Selin Cynthia, Kelly Campbell Rawlings, Kathryn de Ridder-Vignone, Jason Sadowski, Carlo Altamirano Allende et al., “Experiments in Engagement: Designing Public Engagement with Science and Technology for Capacity Building” Public Understanding of Science, No. 6 (2017): 634-649.
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Shaffer Gregory, “Legal Realism and International Law”, [in:] Concepts for International Law: Contributions to Disciplinary Thought, ed. Jean d’Aspremont, Sahib Singh. 671-688. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019.
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Siems Mathias M., “The Taxonomy of Interdisciplinary Legal Research: Finding the Way Out of the Desert” Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education, No. 1 (2009): 5-17.
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Smuha Nathalie A., “From a ‘Race to AI’ to a ‘Race to AI Regulation’: Regulatory Competition for Artificial Intelligence” Law, Innovation and Technology, No. 1 (2021): 57-84.
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Somsen Han, Regulating Human Genetics in a Neo-Eugenic Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Taekema Sanne, Bart van Klink, “On the Border: Limits and Possibilities of Interdisciplinary Research”, [in:] Law and Method: Interdisciplinary Research into Law, edited by Bart van Klink and Sanne Taekema. 7-32. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Tessler Mark, A History of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2009.
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Trachtman Joel P., The Future of International Law: Global Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Trump Benjamin D., Christopher L. Cummings, Jennifer Kuzma, Igor Linkov, Synthetic Biology 2020: Frontiers in Risk Analysis and Governance. Cham: Springer, 2020.
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Research Handbook on International Law and Cyberspace, ed. Nicholas Tsagourias, Russell Buchan. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015.
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Vadi Valentina, Proportionality, Reasonableness and Standards of Review in International Investment Law and Arbitration. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018.
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Weber Rolf H., Evelyne Studer, „Cybersecurity in the Internet of Things: Legal Aspects.” Computer Law & Security Review, No. 5 (2016): 715-728.
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Werbach Kevin, The Blockchain and the New Architecture of Trust. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2018.
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Zumbansen Peer, “Transnational Law as Socio-Legal Theory and Critique: Prospects for ‘Law and Society’ in a Divided World” Buffalo Law Review, No. 3 (2019): 909-962.
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.