Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Case law commentaries

Vol. 55 No. 2 (2025): Law and Social Bonds no. 2 (55) 2025

Commentary on the Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 7 August 2024, III FSK 1148/23

Submitted
5 February 2025
Published
05-06-2025

Abstract

In the commented judgment, the NSA aptly assumed that the subject of inheritance and gift tax can only be the definitive acquisition of the object of the donation. It would be contrary to the purpose of the law, the constitutional principle of proportionality and justice to charge tax in the absence of a definitive acquisition on the part of the recipient, which is the case when a donation is revoked. It should be considered that other situations where there is a revocation of a donation under various civil law provisions should be assessed in the same way. However, a critical assessment is required of the SAC's recognition that a donation has been revoked in a particular case. 

References

  1. Bączyk Mirosław, Leopold Stecki, „Darowizna”, [w:] Prawo zobowiązań – część szczegółowa. System Prawa Prywatnego, t. VII, red. Jerzy Rajski, wyd. 4. Warszawa: C. H. Beck, 2018.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Jezioro Julian, „Komentarz do art. 897”, [w:] Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz, red. Edward Gniewek, Piotr Machnikowski, wyd. 11. Warszawa: C. H. Beck, 2023, Legalis
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Klaczak Piotr, „Konwersja nieważnych czynności prawnych” Forum Prawnicze, nr 4 (2021): 50-66.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Lackoroński Bogusław, „Komentarz do art. 897”, [w:] Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz, red. Witold Borysiak, wyd. 33. Warszawa: C. H. Beck, 2024, Legalis.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Załucki Mariusz, „Komentarz do art. 897”, [w:] Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz, red. Mariusz Załucki. Warszawa: C. H. Beck, 2024, Legalis, nb 1.
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.