logo czasopisma

Articles

No. 33 (2020)

Third-Party Funding – Outline of Issues

Submitted
8 July 2020
Published
11-10-2020

Abstract

The article is an introduction to the issue of third-party funding (or
litigation finance), which has not been analyzed in Polish legal literature yet.
The author presents the mechanism of third-party funding and indicates the main problems that may arise under Polish law with regard to third-party funding. In particular, the possibility of concluding third-party funding agreements and the possibility of qualifying a funder as an intervening party in the meaning of Polish Code of Civil Procedure.

References

  1. Affaki Georges, „A financing is a financing is a financing...”, [w:] Third-Party Finding in International Arbitration, red. Bernardo M. Cremandes, Antonias Dimolits. Paryż: International Chamber of Commerce, 2013.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Alrashid Meriam N., Jane Wessel, John Laird, „Impact of Third Party Funding on Privilege in Litigation and International Arbitration” Dispute Resolution International, nr 2 (2012): 101-29.
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Arbitraż handlowy. System Prawa Handlowego, red. Andrzej Szumański, t. VIII, Warszawa: C.H. Beck, 2015. Legalis online.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Brekoulakis Stavros, Jonas von Goeler, „It’s all about the Money: The Impact of Third-Party Funding on Costs Avards and Security for Costs in Iternational Arbitration”, Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration, 2017.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Goldsmith Aren, Lorenzo Melchionda, „Third party funding in international arbitration: everything you ever wanted to know (but were afraid to ask): Part 1” International Business Law Journal, nr 1 (2012): 53-76.
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Hoffmann-Nowotny Urs, Louis Burrus. „Switzerland”, The Third Party Litigation Funding Law Review, 2019.
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Horodyski Dominik, Maria Kierska, „Third Party Funding in International Arbitration – Legal Problems and Global Trends with a Focus on Disclosure Requirement” Zeszyty Naukowe Towarzystwa Doktorantów UJ Nauki Społeczne, nr 19 (2017): 63-80.
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Chan Melody, „Hong Kong” The Third Party Litigation Funding Law Review, nr 1 (2017): 78-86.
    View in Google Scholar
  9. International Council for Commercial Arbitration. „Report of the ICCA-Queen Mary Task Force on Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration”, 2018.
    View in Google Scholar
  10. http://www.arbitration-icca.org/media/10/40280243154551/icca_reports_4_tpf_final_for_print_5_april.pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz, red. Gniewek Edward, Piotr Machnikowski, wyd. 8. Warszawa: C. H. Beck, 2017.
    View in Google Scholar
  12. http://sip-1legalis-1pl-13ysyp6sg04bf.hansolo.bg.ug.edu.pl/document-view.seam?documentId=mjxw62zogi3
    View in Google Scholar
  13. damjxgazdknroobqxalrugmydqnzzg4za.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz, red. Andrzej Zieliński, Kinga Flaga-Gieruszyńska, wyd. 9. Warszawa: C.H. Beck, 2017. Legalis online.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz, red. Elwira Marszałkowska-Krześ, wyd. 21. Warszawa: C.H. Beck, 2018. Legalis online.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz. Tom I. Art. 1-505[38], red. Małgrzata Manowska, wyd. 3, Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2015. Lex online.
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz. Tom I. Postępowanie rozpoznawcze, red. Tadeusz Ereciński, wyd. 5. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2016. Lex online.
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.