Articles
online-first
The taxonomy of business activity versus social economy.
Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy
Abstract
The European Green Deal has introduced new legal frameworks into the EU economy, including an taxonomy for business activities. While this taxonomy facilitates the comparison of market entities by evaluating them against environmental criteria, it can also make it more difficult to conduct business, lead to exclusion from access to financing, and ultimately result in being forced out of the market.
The standard taxonomy is based on six environmental objectives, and social issues can only be indirectly inferred from them. It would therefore be possible to amend the regulation establishing the taxonomy of economic activities so that it also encompasses the objectives of the social economy and its entities. Articles 17, 18, and, indirectly, article 3 of Regulation 2020/852 are particularly suited for this purpose.
Going further, one could propose the development of a separate “social taxonomy” that would present social objectives in place of environmental ones. Such a solution, which seems quite likely in future European Union legislation, would promote high-quality social economy entities by making it easier for them to operate in the market.
The argument, developed using a legal-dogmatic approach, is based on literature in the field of economic environmental law and legal acts current as of April 30, 2026.
References
- Bierecki Dominik, „Energy Transformation and the Social Economy: The Nexus Between Citizen Energy Communities and Social Enterprises under Polish Law” Europejski Przegląd Prawa i Stosunków Międzynarodowych, nr 1 (2025): 85-98.
View in Google Scholar
- Bojar-Fijałkowski Tomasz, „Prawo klimatyczne i jego nowe instrumenty oddziaływania na gospodarkę” Internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny, 2 (2025): 31-42.
View in Google Scholar
- Bojar-Fijałkowski Tomasz, „The EU Taxonomy as a Business Assessment Tool: Opportunities and Threats, Chances to Use New Technologies” GIS Odyssey Journal, nr 1 (2024): 55-65.
View in Google Scholar
- Bojar-Fijałkowski Tomasz, „Unijna taksonomia jako potencjalny warunek pomocy państwa dla przedsiębiorców – uwagi na gruncie gospodarczego prawa środowiska” Studia Prawnoustrojowe, 63 (2024): 35-47.
View in Google Scholar
- Corvo Luigi, Lavinia Pastore, Marco Mastrodascio, Denita Cepiku, „The Social Return on Investment Model: A Systematic Literature Review” Meditari Accountancy Research, nr 7 (2022): 49-86.
View in Google Scholar
- Jastrzębska Ewa, Barbara Kryk, Agata Lulewicz-Sas, „Reporting Corporate Governance in Accordance with European Sustainability Reporting Standards in Poland” Economics and Environment, nr 1 (2025).
View in Google Scholar
- Moradi Amir, Rabia Fatima, Tessa Groner, Hugo Gobato Souto, „EU Social Taxonomy for Sustainable Economic Activities: Exploring the Known and Navigating the Current Issues as well as Future Research” Discover Sustainability, nr 1 (2024).
View in Google Scholar
- Oostrum van Christina, „Sustainability Through Transparency and Definitions. A Few Thoughts on Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 and Regulation (EU) 2020/852” European Company Law, nr 1 (2021): 15-21.
View in Google Scholar
- Ryszka Joanna, Zrównoważony rozwój i należyta staranność w działalności małych i średnich przedsiębiorców, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, Opole 2025.
View in Google Scholar
- Zetzsche Dirk A., Marco Bodellini, Roberta Consiglio, „Towards a European Social Taxonomy: A Scorecard Approach” SSRN Scholarly Paper, (2022). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4218874.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.