Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 55 No. 2 (2025): Law and Social Bonds no. 2 (55) 2025

The Issue of Access to the Judicial Profession in the Context of Virtue Jurisprudence

Submitted
11 January 2025
Published
05-06-2025

Abstract

The subject of this paper from the philosophy of law is the regulation of access to the judicial profession, due to its impact on the operation of the judiciary. The purpose of the analyses carried out is to evaluate the current regulation from the point of view offered by virtue jurisprudence. The paper reconstructs the current ways of reaching the position of judge, the theoretical background offered by virtue jurisprudence and the formulation of theses on moral development. This made it possible to assess the different ways of entering the judiciary. Equally positive was the form of access to the judiciary through primary and supplementary application, as opposed to the possibility of „transition” from another legal profession. As part of the conclusions, postulates of a de lege lata and de lege ferenda nature were pointed out and an area of research was identified that should be the subject of further research, including empirical research.

References

  1. Amaya, Amaya, “Exemplarism and Judicial Virtue.” Law and literature 25, nr 4 (2013).
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Annas, Julia, “Being Virtous and Doing the Right Thing”, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 78, no. 2 (2004).
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Arthur, James, Stephen Earl . Character In The Professions: How Virtue Informs Practice. Birmingham: Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues, 2020.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Arthur, James. Kristján Kristjánsson, Thomas Hywel, Michael Holdsworth, Luca Badini Confalonieri, Tian Qiu. Virtuous Character For The Practice Of Law. Birmingham: Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues, 2014.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Arthur, James, Kristján Kristjánsson, Aidan Thompson, Ali Fazel. The Jubilee Centre Framework For Virtue-Based Professional Ethics. Birmingham: Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues 2023
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Arystoteles. Etyka Nikomachejska. tłumaczenie Daniela Gromska, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2007
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Audi, Robert. Reasons, Rights, and Values, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Bojarski Łukasz, Judicial Resistance: missing part of judicial independence? The case of Poland and beyond, Oñati Socio-Legal Series, prepublished 2024
    View in Google Scholar
  9. De Caro, Mario, Ariele Niccoli, Maria Silvia Vaccarezza. “Phronesis as Ethical Expertise: Naturalism of Second Nature and the Unity of Virtue”, The Journal of Value Inquiry, 52, nr 3 2018
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Del Mar, Maksymilian. “Judging Virtuously: Developing an Empathic Capacity for Perceptual Sensitivity”, Jurisprudence 5, no. 1, 2014
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Drajewicz Dariusz, „Kryteria powołania na stanowisko sędziego”, Przegląd Sądowy, nr 2, 2017
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Dworkin Ronald, “Is There Really No Right Answer In Hard Cases?” w Ronald Dworkin, A Matter of Principle, Cambridge-Massachusetts: Harvard University Press 1985
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Dworkin Ronald, Taking rights seriously, Cambridge-Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1977
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Häyduk-Hawrylak, Izabela. „art. 61” w Prawo o ustroju sądów powszechnych. Komentarz, red. Izabela Häyduk-Hawrylak, Bartłomiej Kotecki, Anna Wleklińska, Warszawa: C.H Beck, 2018
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Hursthouse, Rosalind. On the virtue ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Kristjánsson, Kristján, Catherine Darnell, Blaine Fowers, Francisco Moller, David Pollard, Stephenn Thoma. Phronesis: Developing A Conceptualisation And An Instrument, Birmingham: The Jubilee Center for Character & Virtue, 2020
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Kristjánsson, Kristján, Blaine Fowers. Phronesis: retrieving practical wisdom in psychology, philosophy, and education, New York: Oxford University Press, 2024
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Kristjánsson, Kristján, Shane McLoughlin, Stephen Thoma. Phronesis: Developing And Validating A Short Measure Of Practical Wisdom, Birmingham: The Jubilee Center for Character & Virtue 2023
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Kristjánsson, Kristján, David Pollard, Catherine Darnell, Stephen Thoma, Phronesis: Using An Aristotelian Model As A Research Tool, Birmingham: The Jubilee Center for Character & Virtue 2021
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Mangini, Michele. “Ethics of virtues and the education of the reasonable judge”, International Journal of Ethics Education 2, 2017
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Miller, Christine. “Flirting with Skepticism about Practical Wisdom” w Practical Wisdom: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives, red. M. S. Vaccarezza, M. De Caro, New York: Routledge, 2021
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Morawski, Lech. “Państwo prawa, filozofia publiczna i odpowiedzialność moralna naukowców”, Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, nr 2, 2014
    View in Google Scholar
  23. „10 filarów ministerialnego programu usprawnienia działalności sądów”, Ministerstwo Sprawiedliwości, dostęp listopada 28, 2024, https://www.gov.pl/web/sprawiedliwosc/10-filarow-ministerialnego-programu-usprawnienia-dzialalnosci-sadowNajwyższa Izba Kontroli, Zapewnienie Sprawnego Funkcjonowania Wymiaru Sprawiedliwości, Warszawa 2024
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Nussbaum, Martha, “Equity and Mercy”, Philosophy & Public Affairs 22, no. 2, 1993
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Skuczynski, Paweł. „Integralność sędziego w orzekaniu i zachowaniu”, Krytyka Prawa 13, nr 3, 2021
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Slote Michael, Empathy, Law and Justice w Virtue, Law and Justice red. Amalia Amaya, Ho Hock Lai, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Snow Nancy, Contemporary Virtue Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2020
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Solum, Lawrence. “Virtue Jurisprudence. A virtue-centred theory of judging”, Metaphilosophy 34, no. ½, 2003
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Soniewicka, Marta. „Integralność sędziego z perspektywy jurysprudencji cnót”, Krytyka Prawa 13, nr 3, 2021
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Stępień, Mateusz. „Droga Przemiany Duszy Sędziowskiej” w: Dyskrecjonalność w prawie, Wiesława Staśkiewicz, Tomasz Stawecki, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze LexisNexis 2010
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Stępień, Matuesz. “On the Relationship between Judicial Empathy and the Integrity of Judges”, Krytyka Prawa 13, nr 3, 2021
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Swanton, Christine. “A Virtue Ethical Account of Right Action”, Ethics 112, no.1, 2001
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Szutta, Natasza. Czy istniej coś co zwiemy moralnym charakterem i cnotą?, Lublin: Wydawnictwo Academicon 2017
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Szutta, Natasza. „Status Współczesnej etyki cnót”, Diametros, nr 1, 2004
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Szutta, Natasza. Współczesna etyka cnót. Projekt nowej etyki?, Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego 2008
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Szutta, Natasza. „Wychowanie Moralne Z Perspektywy Etyki Cnót”, Diametros, nr 46, 2015
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Trzciński, Janusz. „Prawotwórcza funkcja sądów” w Praw w służbie państwu i społeczeństwu. Prace dedykowane Kazimierzowi Działosze z okazji osiemdziesiątych urodzin, red. Banaszak Banaszak, Mariusz Jabłońska, Sylwie Jarosz-Żukowska, Wrocław: wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, 2012
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Vaccarezza, Maria Silvia, Michel Croce, Kristján Kristjánsson, “Phronesis (Practical Wisdom) as a Key to Moral Decision-Making: Comparing Two Models”, Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 2023, dostęp maj 17, 2024 https://www.jubileecentre.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/PhronesisPractical-Wisdom3_03.pdf
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Widłak, Tomasz. “Judges' Virtues and Vices: Outline of a Research Agenda for Legal Theory”, Archiwum Filozofii Prawa I Filozofii Społecznej, nr 2, 2021
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Widłak, Tomasz. “Judicial resistance and the virtues”, Oñati Socio-Legal Series, prepublished, 2024
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Widłak, Tomasz. “Mądrość sędziego” w Cnoty sędziowskie: refleksje prawnicze red. Tomasz Widłak, Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, 2023
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Widłak, Tomasz. “Rule of Law and the Criteria for Appointment of Judges: A Case for Judicial Virtues”, Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, prepublished, 2024
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Włodarczyk-Majewska, Justyna, Paweł Ostaszewski, Joanna Klimczak. „Efektywność pracy sędziów sądów powszechnych. Wyniki analizy wywiadów pogłębionych”, Warszawa 2019
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Zajadło, Jerzy. „Prawo a filozofia w praktyce: tylko łatwe czy także trudne przypadki?” w Jerzy Zajadło Po co prawnikom filozofia prawa?, Warszawa: wydawnictwo Oficyna, 2008
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Zajadło, Jerzy. “Sumienie sędziego”, Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 79, nr 4 2017
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Zajadło, Jerzy. „Nieposłuszeństwo sędziów”, Państwo i Prawo, 71, nr 1, 2016.
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.