logo czasopisma

Artykuły

Nr 3 (2024): Prawo i Więź Nr 3 (50) 2024

Paradigmatic Models of Mediation, Mandatory Eclectics or a Direct Decision

Przesłane
13 marca 2024
Opublikowane
21-08-2024

Abstrakt

The paper conceptually reviews the paradigmatic models of mediation to understand the professional role of a mediator and the scope of ethical obligations. The description of each model presents the corresponding action of a mediator and the standard of intervention in the process, and examines their effectiveness in achieving the goals of mediation. In this regard, the paper examines the content of a mediator's ethical obligations and potential dilemmas in different mediation models that may be associated with a mediator's direct and uniform choice of a particular mediation model. The paper emphasises the importance of a mediator's competence for the proper functioning of a process and, at the same time, analyses the need for a strict demarcation from the professional role of an attorney, which is essential for the ethical execution of a mediator’s role.  

Bibliografia

  1. Alexander Nadja, International and Comparative Mediation Legal Perspectives. Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2009.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  2. Alfini James, „Evaluative versus Facilitative Mediation: A Discussion” Florida State University Law Review, No. 4 (1997): 926. https://ir.law.fsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1447&context=lr.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  3. Anderson Dorcas Quek, „Facilitative Versus Evaluative Mediation, Is there Necessarily a Dichotomy?” Asian Journal on Mediation, (2013): 68. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2889142.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  4. Boulle Laurence, Mediation: Principles, Process, Practice. Chatswood, N.S.W: Lexis Nexis Butterworths, 2005.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  5. Boulle Laurence, Miryana Nesic, Mediation: Principles, Process. London: Tottel, 2001.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  6. Boulle, Laurence, Mediation: Principles, Process, Practice. Butterworths: Lexis Nexis, 2011.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  7. Bush Robert Baruch, „Substituting Mediation for Arbitration: The Growing Market for Evaluative Mediation, and What it Means for the ADR Field” Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, No. 1 (2002):122. https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/drlj/vol3/iss1/6.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  8. Bush Robert Baruch, Joseph Folger, The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict Through Empowerment and Recognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  9. Bush, Robert Baruch, Folger, Joseph, The Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict. United States of Amerika: Jossey-Bass, 2005.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  10. Chern Cyril, The Commercial Mediator’s Handbook. New York: Informa Law from Routledge, 2015.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  11. Chowdhury Jamila, Gender Power and Mediation, Evaluative Mediation to Challenge the Power of Social Discourses. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars, 2012.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  12. Chowdhury Jamila, Gender Power and Mediation, Evaluative Mediation to Challenge the Power of Social Discourses. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars, 2012.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  13. Clark Bryan, Lawyers and Mediation. Heidelberg: Springer, 2012.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  14. Coben James Richard, Peter Thompson, „The Haghighi Trilogy and the Minnesota Civil Mediation Act: Exposing a Phantom Menace Casting a Pall Over the Development of ADR in Minnesota” Hamline Journal of Public Law & Policy, 20 (1999): 299-324. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1723301.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  15. Craver Charles, „The Use of Mediation to Resolve Community Disputes, Washington University Journal of Law & Policy” New Directions in Community Lawyering Social Entrepreneurship, and Dispute Resolution, 48 (2015): 237. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol48/iss1/13.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  16. Dubler Nancy, Carol Liebman, Bioethics Mediation, A Guide to Shaping Shared Solutions. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 2011.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  17. Ethical Mediation, Advocate, Vancouver Bar Association, Vol. 79, part 6, 857.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  18. Feehily Ronán, International Commercial Mediation, Law and Regulation in Comparative Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  19. Feerick, John et al., „Standards of Professional Conduct in Alternative Dispute Resolution” Journal of Dispute Resolution, No. 1 (1995): 101-102.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  20. Field Rachael, Jonathan Crowe, Mediation Ethics, From Theory to Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  21. Folger Joseph, Robert A. Baruch Bush, „Transformative Mediation, A self-assessment” International Journal of Conflict Engagement and Resolution, No.1 (2014): 20-34.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  22. Freund James, Anatomy of a Mediation: a Dealmaker's Distinctive approach to Resolving Dollar Disputes and other Commercial Conflicts. New York: Practising Law Institute, 2012.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  23. General Reports of the XIXth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law Rapports Généraux du XIXème Congrès de l'Académie Internationale de Droit Comparé. ed. Schauer Martin, Bea Verschraegen. The Netherlands: Springer, 2017.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  24. Golann Dwight, „Variations in Mediation: How – and Why – Legal Mediators Change Styles in the Course of a Case, Journal of Dispute Resolution” University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository, No. 1 (2000): 42. https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1047&context=jdr.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  25. Hinshaw Art, Andrea Kupfer Schneider, Sarah Rudolph Cole, Discussions in Dispute Resolutioni. The Foundational Articles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  26. Hopt Klaus, Felix Steffek, Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  27. Hyman Jonathan, Lela Love, „If Portia Were a Mediator: An Inquiry into Justice in Mediation” Clinical Law Review, (2002): 157. https://www.pgpmediation.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/If-Portia-Were-a-Mediator-9-Clinical-L-Rev-157.pdf.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  28. Imperati Samuel, „Alternative Dispute Resolution Symposium Issue: Mediator Practice Models: The Intersection of Ethics and Stylistic Practices in Mediation” Willamette Law Review, (1997): 2-7. https://www2.mediate.com/ICM/docs/Willamette%20Law%20Review%20Excerpt.pdf.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  29. Kandashvili Irakli, Mediation. Tbilisi: Cezanne, 2022 (in Georgian).
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  30. Laflin Maureen, „Preserving the Integrity of Mediation Through the Adoption of Ethical Rules for Lawyer-Mediators” Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, No. 1 (2000): 486. https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjlepp/vol14/iss1/14.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  31. Lee Joel, Marcus Tao Shien Lim, Contemporary Issues In Mediation. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company, 2016.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  32. Levin Murray, „The Propriety of Evaluative Mediation: Concerns about the Nature and Quality of an Evaluative Opinion” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, Vol. XVI (2001): 267-296. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/159560678.pdf.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  33. Love Lela, „The Top Ten Reasons Why Mediators Should Not Evaluate” Florida State University Review, No. 4 (1997): 939. https://ir.law.fsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1448&context=lr.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  34. Love Lela, John Cooley, „The Intersection of Evaluation by Mediators and Informed Consent: Warning the Unwary” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, No. 1 (2005): 45-46.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  35. Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes, ed. Catharine Titi Katia Fach Gómez. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  36. Moberly Robert, „Mediator Gag Rules: Is It Ethical for Mediators to Evaluate or Advise?” South Texas Law Review, 38 (1997): 772.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  37. Moffitt Michael, Andrea Kupfer Schneider, Examples & Explanations: Dispute Resolution. United States: Aspen Publishers, 2011.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  38. Munjal Diksha, „Tug of War: Evaluative versus Facilitative Mediator” Pretoria Student Law Review, 6 (2012): 72-73, 79. https://upjournals.up.ac.za/index.php/pslr/article/view/2137/2022.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  39. Noce Dorothy Della, „Evaluative Mediation: In Search of Practice Competencies” Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 27 (2009): 139, 208-209. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2263813.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  40. Nolan-Haley Jacqueline, „Court Mediation and the Search for Justice through Law” Washington University Law Review, No. 1 (1996): 65-66.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  41. Nolan-Haley Jacqueline, „Informed Consent in Mediation: A Guiding Principle for Truly Educated Decision-making” Notre Dame Law Review, 74 (1999): 797, 834-838. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/274/.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  42. Nylund Anna, Kaijus Ervasti, Lin Adrian, Nordic Mediation Research. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2019.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  43. Ordover Abraham, Andrea Doneff, Alternatives to Litigation, Mediation, Arbitration and the Art of Dispute Resolution. Boulder: National Institute for Trial Advocacy, 2014.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  44. Pou Charles, „Assuring Excellence, or Merely Reassuring? Policy and Practice in Promoting Mediator Quality” Journal of Dispute Resolution, No. 2 (2004): 303-354. https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1470&context=jdr.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  45. Riskin Leonard, „Mediator Orientations, Strategies and Techniques” Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation, No. 9 (1994): 111-114. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1506704.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  46. Riskin Leonard, „Understanding Mediators' Orientations, Strategies, and Techniques: A Grid for the Perplexed” Harvard Negotiation Law Review, No. 7 (1996): 8-51, 35-36. http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/668.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  47. Roberts Kenneth, „Mediating the Evaluative-Facilitative Debate: Why Both Parties Are Wrong and a Proposal for Settlement” Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, No. 1 (2007): 192, 198.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  48. Roberts Marian, Mediation in Family Disputes, Principles of Practice. London-New York: Routledge-Taylor and Francis Group, 2014.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  49. Russel Murray, The Mediation Handbook, Effective Strategies for Litigators. Denver Colorado: Bradford Publishing Company, 2011.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  50. Santos Hugo Luz dos, Towards a Four-Tiered Model of Mediation Against the Background of a Narrative of Social Sub-systems in Everlasting Cross-Fertilization. Singapore: Springer, 2023.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  51. Self-Determination in Mediation, The Art and Science of Mirrors and Lights. ed. Dan Simon, Rara West. Lan Ham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2022.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  52. Shapira Omer, „Joining Forces in Search for Answers: The Use of Therapeutic Jurisprudence in the Realm of Mediation Ethics” Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, No. 2 (2008): 244.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  53. Shapira Omer, A Theory of Mediator’s Ethics, Foundations, Rationale and Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  54. Stark James, „Preliminary Reflections on the Establishment of a Mediation Clinic” Clinical Law Review, 2 (1996): 487. https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/law_papers/166.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  55. Stark James, „The Ethics of Mediation Evaluation: Some Troublesome Questions And Tentative Proposals, from an Evaluative Lawyer Mediator” South Texas Law Review, 38 (1997): 795. https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1198&context=law_papers.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  56. Stempel Jeffrey, „The Inevitability of the Eclectic: Liberating ADR from Ideology” Journal of Dispute Resolution, No. 2 (2000): 247, 275. https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/217.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  57. Stitt Alan, Mediation Practical Guide. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, 2016.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  58. Tallodi Timea, How Parties Experience Mediation, An Interview Study on Relationship Changes in Workplace Mediation. Springer International Publishing, 2020.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  59. The Negotiator’s Fieldbook, The Desk Reference for the Experienced Negotiator, ed. Schneider Andrea Kupfer, Christopher Honeyman. Washington, DC: ABA Section of Dispute Resolution, 2006.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  60. Waldman Ellen, Mediation Ethics, Cases and Commentaries. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  61. Weckstein Donald, „In Praise of Party Empowerment And of Mediator Activism” Willamette Law Review, 33 (1997): 526.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  62. Wolski Bobette, „An Ethical Evaluation Process for Mediators: A Preliminary Exploration of Factors Which Impact Ethical Decision-Making” Ethics in Alternative Dispute Resolution, No. 1 (2017-2018): 69, 70, 71.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar
  63. Zena Zumeta, „A Facilitative Mediator Responds” Journal of Dispute Resolution, No. 2 (2000): 337. https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol2000/iss2/8.
    Pokaż w Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.