logo czasopisma

Articles

No. 3 (2024): Law & Social Bonds Nr 4 (50) 2024

UNIFORM CIVIL CODE, LEGAL PLURALISM AND INHERITANCE RIGHTS OF TRIBAL INDIAN WOMEN

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI50.857
Submitted
13 February 2024
Published
21 August 2024

Abstract

The 42nd Amendment to the Indian Constitution[1] heralded India as a "Sovereign, Socialist, Secular Democratic Republic". This initiated a constitutional narrative that has sparked ongoing debates and scrutiny regarding the true essence of India's secularism. As the nation approaches the 2024 general elections, the ruling party has discussed the potential implementation of the Uniform Civil Code at the forefront of political discourse. Currently, numerous areas of civil law are regulated by personal laws, encompassing Hindu, Muslim, Christian, and Parsi Law. Notably, communities like Sikhs, Jainas, Buddhists, Dalits, Scheduled Castes, and tribes are categorised as Hindus under the Hindu Personal Laws[2]. The adoption of the Uniform Civil Code is intrinsically linked to the rejection of these personal laws. This raises several questions and contradictions relating to the state of multireligious secular India and its dynamics with the women’s rights movement. The introduction of a Uniform Civil Code limits the nature of legal pluralism in India and can hinder the governance of tribal societies through customary laws. Under the scope of this commentary, the authors discuss the legal pluralism in India and the impact of the introduction of a uniform civil code on customary laws of tribes placing special emphasis on the inheritance rights of tribal women. The paper also discusses the approach of the higher courts in securing property rights for tribal women in the absence of such a   code.

References

  1. Afaq Ahmar, Sukhvinder Singh Dari, „Understanding Uniform Civil Code: Its Need and Challenges” Russian Law Journal, No. 1S (2023), https://doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v11i1S.358.
  2. Ahmmed F., „Challenges of Aging and Coping Mechanisms among the Khasi and Garo Tribal Groups: An Ethnographic Observation” Journal of International Social Issues, No. 1 (n.d.): 23-38.
  3. Ambedkar B. R., Vasant Moon, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches. New Delhi: Dr. Ambedkar Foundation, 2014.
  4. Ambedkar B. R., Sharmila Rege, Against the Madness of Manu: B.R. Ambedkar’s Writings on Brahmanical Patriarchy. New Delhi: Navayana Publishing Pvt. Ltd, 2013.
  5. Ao Temsula, „Land, Ethics and Economic Management among Ao Nagas” Institute of Northeast India Studies, 1 (2010).
  6. Das J.N., A Study of Land System in Manipur. Law Research Institute of Guwahati High Court, 1989.
  7. Das Ranga Ranjan, „Gender, Customary Laws and Codification – The North-Eastern Perspectives”, [in:] Gender Implications of Tribal Customary Law: The Case of North-East India. North Eastern Social Research Centre ; Rawat Publications, 2017.
  8. De Sousa Santos Boaventura, „Law: A Map of Misreading. Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law” Journal of Law and Society, No. 3 (1987): 279-302. https://doi.org/10.2307/1410186.
  9. Galanter Marc, „Justice in Many Rooms: Courts, Private Ordering, and Indigenous Law” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, No. 19 (1981): 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1981.10756257.
  10. Ghosh Gitanjali, „Gender Preference in Customary Inheritance Laws of the Khasi Tribe in India: Myth or Fact?” SSRN Electronic Journal, (2021), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3793397.
  11. Gissel Line Engbo, „Nomos and Narrative in International Criminal Justice” Journal of International Criminal Justice, No. 1 (2022): 117-138. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqac004.
  12. Griffiths John, „What Is Legal Pluralism?” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 24 (1986).
  13. Hart H. L. A., Leslie Green, Joseph Raz, Penelope A. Bulloch, The Concept of Law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 2012.
  14. Hooker Michael Barry, Legal Pluralism: An Introduction to Colonial and Neo-Colonial Laws. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.
  15. Mahanta Aparna, „Understanding Politics of Identity and Ethnicity in North East India: A Gender Perspective”, [in:] In Souvenir: North East India History Association. Dibrugarh, 2008.
  16. Malinowski Bronislaw, Crime and Custom in Savage Society. NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1985.
  17. Merry Sally Engle, „Legal Pluralism” Law & Society Review, No. 5 (1988): 869. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638.
  18. Misra Bani Prassana, „Agrarian Relations in a Khasi State” Economic and Political Weekly, No. 20 (1979): 888-892.
  19. Moore Sally Falk, „Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study” Law & Society Review, No. 4 (1973): 719-746. https://doi.org/10.2307/3052967.
  20. Mukhim Patricia, „Crisis of Authority in the Khasi Matrilineal Society”, [in:] The Dynamics of Family System in a Matriliny of Meghalaya. Tribal Research Institute, 1999.
  21. Nongbri Tiplut, „Khasi Women and Matriliny: Transformations in Gender Relations” Gender, Technology and Development, No. 3 (2000): 359-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2000.11909976.
  22. Pakyntein Valentina, „Gender Preference in Khasi Society: An Evaluation of Tradition, Change and Continuity” Indian Anthropologist, Indian Anthropological Association, 30 (2000): 27-35.
  23. Pal Samaraditya, Deepan Kumar Sarkar, India’s Constitution: Origins and Evolution: Constituent Assembly Debates, Lok Sabha Debates on Constitutional Amendments and Supreme Court Judgments. Gurgaon, Haryana, India: LexisNexis, 2017.
  24. Pospisil Leopold, Anthropology of Law: A Comparative Theory. New York Evanston San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1971.
  25. Rajak Komal, „Trajectories of Women’s Property Rights in India: A Reading of the Hindu Code Bill” Contemporary Voice of Dalit, No. 1 (2020): 82-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455328X19898420.
  26. Rivers W. H. R., Social Organisation. Stephen, Austin & Sons Ltd., 1924.
  27. Singh Jyoti, Kajori Bhatnagar, „Evaluating the Categorical Exclusion of Khasi Women from Inheritance and Property Rights: A Case of East Khasi Hills” International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 30 January (2024): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-bja10143.
  28. Singh M. P., „On Uniform Civil Code, Legal Pluralism And The Constitution Of India” Journal of Indian Law and Society, Vol. V (2014).
  29. Tamahana Brain Z., „Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global” Sydney Law Review, 29 (2007).
  30. Woodman Gordon R., „Ideological Combat and Social Observation: Recent Debate about Legal Pluralism” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, No. 42 (1998): 21-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1998.10756513.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.