logo czasopisma

Articles

Vol. 57 No. 4 (2025): Prawo i Więź nr 4 (57) 2025

Hungary without Capital Punishment: The Issue of the Deterrent Effect in Light of Criminal Statistics (1975-2024)

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI57.570
Submitted
24 November 2022
Published
6 October 2025

Abstract

One of the most important issues related to the death penalty is whether it has a deterrent effect and can prevent potential perpetrators, primarily potential murderers, from committing crimes. However, positions expressed in the related theoretical debate must first of all be based on practical experience, especially statistical analyses that can provide probabilistic arguments for the strength of the deterrent effect theory. This study examines the homicide trend in Hungary over the past 50 years and concludes that, although the presence or absence of a deterrent effect cannot be precisely determined in theory, practical experience suggests that it plays a negligible role in the perpetrators’ motivation.

References

  1. Bailey William C., “Disaggregation in deterrence and death-penalty research: the case of murder in Chicago” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, No. 3 (1983): 827-859.
  2. Beccaria Cesare, An Essay on Crimes and Punishments. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2011. http://files.libertyfund.org/files/2193/Beccaria_1476_EBk_v6.0.pdf.
  3. Bedau Hugo Adam, The Death Penalty in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.
  4. Executions in America, ed. William J. Bowers. Lexington: Lexington Books, D. C. Heath and Company, Massachusetts, 1974.
  5. Bowers William J., Glenn L. Pierce, “Deterrence or brutalization: what is the effect of executions?” Crime and Deliquency, October (1980): 453-484.
  6. Cloninger Dale O., Roberto Marchesini, “Execution and deterrence: a quasi-controlled group experiment” Applied Economics, No. 5 (2001): 569-576.
  7. Cloninger Dale O., Roberto Marchesini, “Execution Moratoriums, Commutations and Deterrence: The Case of Illinois” Applied Economics, No. 9 (2006): 967-977.
  8. Cochran John. K., Mitchell B. Chamlin, Mark Seth, “Deterrence or Brutalization? An Impact Assessment of Oklahoma's Return to Capital Punishment” Criminology, No. 1 (1994): 107-134.
  9. Deak Alexander, “On Capital Punishment” [“A halálbüntetésről”] Belügyi Szemle [Review of Interior Affairs], 1 (1995): 55-57.
  10. Ehrlich Isaac, “Deterrence: Evidence and Inference” Yale Law Journal, Vol. LXXXV (1975-1976): 209-227.
  11. Ehrlich Isaac, “Fear of Deterrence” Journal of Legal Studies, (1977): 293-316.
  12. Ehrlich Isaac, “The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: A Question of Life and Death” American Economic Review, June (1975): 397-417.
  13. Ehrlich Isaac, “The Deterrent Effect of Criminal Law Enforcement” Journal of Legal Studies, No. 1 (1972).
  14. Ehrlich Isaac, “On Positive Methodology, Ethics, and Polemics in Deterrence Research” British Journal of Criminology, Vol. XXII (1982): 124-139.
  15. Ehrlich Isaac, Zhiqiang Liu, “Sensitivity Analyses of the Deterrence Hypothesis: Let’s Keep the Econ in Econometrics” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. XLII (1999): 455-487.
  16. Friedman Lee S., “The Use of Multiple Regression Analysis to Test for a Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: Prospects and Problems” Deptartment of Economics, University of California at Berkeley, Working Paper, No. 38 (1976): 39-41.
  17. Kiss Rebeka, Miklós Sebők, “The concept of tailor‑made laws and legislative backsliding in Central–Eastern Europe” Comparative European Politics, Vol. XXIII (2025): 353-409. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-024-00403-6.
  18. Ochwat Maria, “Death penalty in Poland. Relict or possible threat” Reality of Politics, No. 4 (2023): 58-75. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15804/rop2023405.
  19. Pálinkás György, “Requiem for a legal institution [Requiem egy jogintézményért]” Belügyi Szemle [Review of Interior Affairs], 6 (2001): 63-73.
  20. Passell Peter, John B. Taylor, “The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: Another View” American Economic Review, No. 3 (1977): 445-451.
  21. Peck Jon K., “The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: Ehrlich and His Critics” Yale Law Journal, Vol. LXXXV (1975-1976): 359-367.
  22. Sellin Thorsten, “Capital Punishment” Federal Probation, Vol. XXV (1961): 3-11.
  23. Shepherd Joanna M, “Murders of Passion, Execution Delays and the Deterrence of Capital Punishment” Journal of Legal Studies, No. 2 (2004) 283-322.
  24. Stolzenberg Lisa, Stewart J. D’Alessio, “Capital Punishment, Execution Publicity and Murder in Houston, Texas” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, No. 2 (2003-2004): 351-379.
  25. Toth J. Zoltan. Capital Punishment: Pros and Cons [Halálbüntetés pró és kontra]. Budapest: HVG-ORAC, 2012.
  26. Toth J. Zoltan, Changing Attitudes Towards the Death Penalty: Hungary’s Renewed Support for Capital Punishment. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-47557-4.
  27. Toth J. Zoltan, “Decision 23/1990 (X. 31.) AB – Death Penalty”, [in:] The main lines of the jurisprudence of the Hungarian Constitutional Court. 30 case studies from the 30 years of the Constitutional Court (1990 to 2020), red. Fruzsina Gárdos-Orosz, Kinga Zakariás. 45-60. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, 2022.
  28. Toth J. Zoltan, “The post-abolition era in Hungary: Endeavours and political intentions to reintroduce capital punishment” Jogelméleti Szemle (Journal of Legal Theory), No 3, (2022/2023): 144-162. https://jesz.ajk.elte.hu/2022_3.pdf.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.