Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 63 No. 4 (2026): Law&Social Bonds

The Right to Privacy in the Constitution and Civil Code of China in the Context of Personal Data Protection

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36128/zznzjan
Submitted
21 April 2025
Published
24 September 2026

Abstract

The subject of this article is the analysis of the right to privacy as enshrined in the Constitution and Civil Code of the People's Republic of China, with particular emphasis on its dimension concerning the protection of personal data. The author examines whether the Chinese Constitution formulates a right to privacy – including the right to personal data protection – and whether the manner of this regulation distinguishes it from the constitutional frameworks of selected European and American systems referenced in the article. A distinctive feature of the Chinese legal and political system may be the relatively weaker protection of privacy in the relationship between individuals and public authorities, in contrast to stronger enforcement mechanisms in private sector contexts. However, individual privacy rights are increasingly upheld in judicial decisions and regulatory rulings involving private actors, and violations of data protection law are subject to administrative sanctions. The article also explores how collectivist and Confucian traditions have shaped the development of the Chinese concept of privacy. Nonetheless, through the application of dogmatic, normative and comparative legal methods, the author identifies substantive convergence between the Chinese and European approaches. This is demonstrated by reference to contemporary Chinese civil law scholarship, constitutional provisions, civil code regulations on privacy and the Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL).

References

  1. Ahmed, Shazeda. „The Messy Truth About Social Credit" Logic Magazine. https://logicmag.io/china/the-messy-truth-about-social-credit/.
  2. „Breaching the Taboo? Constitutional Dimensions of the New Chinese Civil Code" Asian Journal of Comparative Law 18, nr 1 (2023). https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/7455DBC9FCE5022424F531D0B0A0DB66/S2194607823000182a.pdf.
  3. Cao, Jingchun. „Protecting the Right to Privacy in China" Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 36, nr 3 (2005): 645–662. https://www.austlii.edu.au/nz/journals/VUWLawRw/2005/25.html.
  4. Chan, Tara Francis. „Debtors in China Are Placed on a Blacklist" Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/chinas-tax-blacklist-shames-debtors-2017-12?IR=T.
  5. The Chinese Civil Code in the Global Legal Order. Leiden: Brill, 2022. https://brill.com/abstract/title/68328.
  6. Cosgrove, Elly. „One Billion Surveillance Cameras Will Be Watching Around the World in 2021, a New Study Says" CNBC, 6.12.2019. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/06/one-billion-surveillance-cameras-will-be-watching-globally-in-2021.html.
  7. Corcoran, Kieran. „California's Economy Is Now the 5th-Biggest in the World, and Has Overtaken the United Kingdom" Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/california-economy-ranks-5th-in-the-world-beating-the-uk-2018-5.
  8. Dargas-Draganik, Marta. „Emerging Constitutionalism in the People's Republic of China" Gdańskie Studia Azji Wschodniej, nr 16 (2019): 68–76.
  9. Dargas-Draganik, Marta. Idee i zasady konstytucyjne chińskiego porządku prawnego. Warszawa: C.H. Beck, 2017.
  10. Doyle, Alister, Alistair Scrutton. „Privacy, What Privacy? Many Nordic Tax Records Are a Phone Call Away" Reuters, 12.04.2016. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0X91S0/.
  11. Du, Guodong (杜国栋). „China's First Right to Be Forgotten Case" China Justice Observer. https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/chinas-first-the-right-to-be-forgotten-case.
  12. Feldstein, Steven. „The Road to Digital Unfreedom: How Artificial Intelligence Is Reshaping Repression" Journal of Democracy 30, nr 1 (2019): 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0003.
  13. Gerety, Tom. „Redefining Privacy" Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberties Law Review 12 (1977): 234–284.
  14. Huang, Songyou. „Judicial Application of the Constitution and Its Significance" People's Court Daily, 13.08.2001.
  15. International Monetary Fund. World Economic Outlook – April 2024. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2024/04/16/world-economic-outlook-april-2024.
  16. Jiang, Ming'an, et al. „A Roundtable Discussion on Judicialization of the Constitution" Southern Weekend, 13.08.2001.
  17. Jili, Bulelani. China's Surveillance Ecosystem & the Global Spread of Its Tools. Washington, DC: Atlantic Council, 2022. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Chinas-Surveillance-Ecosystem-The-Global-Spread-Of-Its-Tools.pdf.
  18. Kellogg, Thomas E. „The Death of Constitutional Litigation in China?" China Brief 9, nr 7 (2009). https://jamestown.org/program/the-death-of-constitutional-litigation-in-china/.
  19. Krzysztofek, Mariusz. Porównanie prawa ochrony danych osobowych w największych gospodarkach świata. Regulacje Unii Europejskiej (RODO), Chin (PIPL) i Kalifornii (CCPA). Warszawa: C.H. Beck, 2025.
  20. Laidler, Paweł. Konstytucja Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki. Przewodnik. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2008.
  21. Liang, Huixin, Liao Xinzhong. „The Essence of Privacy and the Concept of the Right to Privacy" (2003).
  22. Łągiewska, Monika. „Charakterystyka chińskiego prawa cywilnego – wybrane aspekty" Transformacje Prawa Prywatnego, nr 2 (2021). https://journals.law.uj.edu.pl/TPP/article/download/532/521/4130.
  23. Malmgren, Otto. „Article 37: The Right to Liberty of Person Under the Chinese Constitution" China-EU Law Journal 2 (2013): 35–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1268901100029.
  24. Modern Chinese Dictionary, wyd. 2. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 1978.
  25. Motyka, Krzysztof. „O amerykańskiej koncepcji prawa do prywatności i jej wpływie na prawo międzynarodowe (artykuł recenzyjny)" Studia Prawnicze KUL, nr 1 (2017): 203–220. https://doi.org/10.31743/sp.3374.
  26. Nolan, Mercedes. „Is Google Still Blocked in China?" NCESC, 26.02.2025. https://www.ncesc.com/geographic-faq/is-google-still-blocked-in-china/.
  27. Park, Grace. „The Changing Wind of Data Privacy Law: A Comparative Study of the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation and the 2018 California Consumer Privacy Act" UC Irvine Law Review 10, nr 4 (2020): 1455–1489.
  28. Piechowiak, Marek. „Pojęcie praw człowieka", [w:] Podstawowe prawa jednostki oraz ich sądowa ochrona, red. Leszek Wiśniewski, 7–37. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe, 1997.
  29. Privacy International, Electronic Privacy Information Center. Privacy and Human Rights 2004: An International Survey of Privacy Laws and Developments. Washington, DC: EPIC, 2004.
  30. Prosser, William L. „Privacy" California Law Review 48, nr 3 (1960): 383–423.
  31. Prosser, William L. Restatement (Second) of Torts. Philadelphia: American Law Institute, 1977.
  32. Ran, Keping (冉克平). „On the Protection and Usage of Private Information in the Civil Code (论《民法典》视野下个人隐私信息的保护与利用)" Social Science Journal, nr 5 (2021): 103–111.
  33. Restatement of the Law of Rights of the Person, red. Wang Liming. Changchun: Jilin People's Press, 1994.
  34. Santoni, G. „Personal Data as a Market Commodity" European Journal of Privacy Law & Technology 3, nr 1 (2023): 128–146. https://doi.org/10.57230/ejplt231GS.
  35. Shtub, Tamar Giladi, Michal Gal. „The Competitive Effects of China's Legal Data Regime" Journal of Competition Law and Economics (2022). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4111727.
  36. Spagnoli, Federico. „La riforma della Costituzione cinese: un'analisi della revisione costituzionale del 2018 e dei suoi caratteri principali" DPCE Online 38, nr 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.57660/dpceonline.2019.647.
  37. Standler, Ronald B. Privacy Law in the USA. 1996, ost. rewizja 24.05.1998. http://www.rbs2.com/privacy.htm.
  38. Szpotakowski, Igor. „Polish and Chinese Civil Law Perspectives on the Principle of Good Faith". Academia.edu, 2020. https://www.academia.edu/44488662.
  39. Szpotakowski, Igor. „Konstytucyjne ramy systemu rządów w Chińskiej Republice Ludowej" Białostockie Studia Prawnicze 24, nr 4 (2019). https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2019.24.04.12.
  40. Chinese Civil Law, red. Tong Rou. Beijing: The Press of Laws, 1990.
  41. Tong, Zhiwei. Qi Yuling's Case. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/27990970/QI_YULINGS_CASE_by_Tong_Zhiwei_kopi.
  42. „Why China Has the Most Surveillance Cameras in the World" Unanswered, 19.08.2026. https://unanswered.io/guide/why-china-has-most-surveillance-cameras.
  43. Warren, Samuel D., Louis D. Brandeis. „The Right to Privacy" Harvard Law Review 4, nr 5 (1890): 193–220.
  44. Zhang, Justina, Eric Johnson. „A Constitutional View of Privacy Rights in China" Legal Practice, 19.10.2020. https://www.uianet.org/en/news/constitutional-view-privacy-rights-china.
  45. Zhang, Xinbao. „On the Right to Privacy" Faxue Yanjiu (Study on Legal Science), nr 3 (1990).
  46. Shi, Zhengyu. The Right to Be Forgotten in China – A Third Way to Construct Public Sphere. 3 April 2021. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3832803.
  47. Zhou, Hanhua. „Parallel or Intersection: The Relationship between Personal Information Protection and Right to Privacy in China" Peking University Law Journal 33 (2021): 1167–1187.
  48. Zhou, Wei (周伟). Judicial Remedies and Basic Rights in the Constitution (宪法基本权利司法救济研究). Beijing, b.d.
  49. Zhu, Guobin. „The Right to Privacy: An Emerging Right in Chinese Law" Statute Law Review 18, nr 3 (1997): 208–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/18.3.208.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.